Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/32840Closes#31516
I've cherry-picked the original PR that had merge conficts + updated all
the headers as the one for the TurboModule generators were not handled.
Original Commit Message from acoates
The codegen generates a Facebook copyright notice at the top of the generated files.
While this might make sense on the core files, this codegen will be run on external components too.
The notice also refers to a LICENSE file in the root of this project, which might not be there if this is run on another project.
I did a quick look at some of the codegen that we ship within windows dev tools, and it looks like we normally just have comments
saying the file was codegen'd and so the file shouldn't be manually edited.
Open to suggestions on what the comment header should say.
Changelog:
[General] [Changed] - Do not include Facebook license on users codegen'd code
Reviewed By: ShikaSD
Differential Revision: D33455176
fbshipit-source-id: b247e72efb242e79d99b388c80e4126633e5234d
Summary:
## Context
Inside native ViewConfigs, events are declared using these bubbling/direct EventType maps:
```
{
uiViewClassName: '...',
bubblingEventTypes: {
topFoo: {
registrationName: "onFoo"
}
},
directEventTypes: {},
validAttributes: {
},
}
```
**Pattern:** Note that the top name (i.e: topFoo) is just the registration name (i.e: onFoo) but with "on" replaced with "top".
On Android, registration names and top names don't have to follow this pattern. The top name can be **anything.** See ReactionsDockView:
https://www.internalfb.com/code/fbsource/[c430d46ed69a03a9d9f40cefa335a6d8bb92f8ec]/fbandroid/java/com/facebook/feedback/reactions/ui/overlay/react/ReactionsDockViewManager.java?lines=26-28%2C32-34%2C38
Here, ReactionDismissedEvent.EVENT_NAME is "topDismiss"
https://www.internalfb.com/code/fbsource/[c9f92314a5c46e561a831100dab82164808b05d0]/fbandroid/java/com/facebook/feedback/reactions/ui/overlay/react/ReactionDismissedEvent.java?lines=10-11%2C26
And so to provide you the flexibility to specify a custom topName, the codegen supports a customTopName in the direct/bubbling event types:
```
onDismissWithFeedbackReaction: DirectEventHandler<Event, 'topDismiss'>,
```
This generates the two bubbling event type entries in ReactionsDockView:
```
{
uiViewClassName: '...',
bubblingEventTypes: {
// custom top name
topDismiss: {
registrationName: "onDismissWithFeedbackReaction"
},
// what the top name should actually be
topDismissWithFeedbackReaction: {
registrationName: "onDismissWithFeedbackReaction"
}
},
directEventTypes: {},
validAttributes: {
},
}
```
**The Problem:** The entry created for "topDismissWithFeedbackReaction" is not necessary. This additional entry creates a discrepancy between ReactionsDockView's static ViewConfig and native ViewConfig. Therefore, this diff removes the second unnecessary entry.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D33418730
fbshipit-source-id: 3988ff6906ad1b2e1ef988a19c64d1e042381ab1
Summary:
With SVC enabled for codegenNativeComponent, use `UIManager.hasViewManagerConfig(viewManagerName)` instead of `UIManager.getViewManagerConfig(viewManagerName)` to check for whether the native component is in the app BUCK binary.
This is safe because `global.__fbStaticViewConfig` is gated with MC, and the purpose of SVCs is to stop using `getViewManagerConfig` to get view configs from the Paper view managers. Currently no QEs have SVCs enabled.
Changelog:
[Fabric][JS] For codegenNativeComponent, with SVC enabled, use UIManager hasViewManagerConfig instead of getViewManagerConfig
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D33511365
fbshipit-source-id: 58c7020903137e2b5c80ef34a956be04de51628b
Summary:
For every direct and bubbling event, RCTComponentData (iOS-only) creates a {eventName}: true entry in the component's ViewConfig validAttributes. This entry is unnecessary, and creates a discrepancy between ViewConfigs on iOS vs Android.
This diff removes this entry for all events to:
1. Reduce bloat in native ViewConfigs
2. Create consistency betweeen Android and iOS.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D33303950
fbshipit-source-id: 870c8a2a6d41156ac89bd8554eb09f292bb6108e
Summary:
**Motivation:** Readability. It was hard to tell how componentName, paperComponentName, and paperComponentNameDepreacted produced the NativeComponentRegistry.get call.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: philIip
Differential Revision: D32108276
fbshipit-source-id: ea7c9fe4dc50cdd6fec94b5cd25f7bbcfb451ef6
Summary:
## Rationale
**Disclaimer**: This is an incremental step towards more maintainable/readable react-native-codegen generators. In the future, we may want to replace these templates/string concat logic with *something better*. But until we decide what that *something better* is, let's at least get rid of all this gross string find/replace.
Benefits of using Function templates over String.prototype.replace.
- **Self-documenting**: Template Functions enumerate/describe their exact data dependencies in their signature. You no longer have to read the template implementation to see what data you need to pass into the template.
- **Improved Readability**: JavaScript syntax highlighting makes it really easy to see where/how the data is inserted into the templates. Also template variables used be prefixed/suffixed with ::, which made things really confusing in C++ code (e.g: wtf is `::_CLASSNAME_::EventEmitter::::_EVENT_NAME_::`?).
- **Simpler Interpolation**: Don't have to worry about .replaceAll vs .replace, or calling these replace functions with regexes or strings.
- **Template Type-safety**: Ensure that the correct data types are passed to the component templates (e.g: flow will complain if you accidentally pass null/undefined when a template expects a string).
- **Template Type-safety**: Ensure that we don't pass in extra data to templates (this diff catches/fixes instances of this error). Ensure that we don't forget to pass in data to the template.
- etc.
After this diff, both our Component and NativeModule generators will be using template functions. This string find/replace exists no more in react-native-codegen.
This is also a very surface-level change. I made no efforts to simplify these templates. Let's take a look at that later, as necessary.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D32021441
fbshipit-source-id: f8f27069bcbf9d66dcafb7d1411da1f938eb6dcd
Summary:
I had to make this change when enabling Fabric in OSS. Without the full path, it can't find the modules like processColor within node_modules.
Changelog: Internal
Reviewed By: motiz88
Differential Revision: D31300424
fbshipit-source-id: 59b82470ec1ce63b63704931786e22b98f4bf046
Summary:
Changelog: [Internal]
Some environments that use codegen don't have Haste enabled, breaking the `require('NativeComponentRegistry')` call in generated view configs. Here we change it to reference an explicit path relative to `react-native`.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D31166063
fbshipit-source-id: cebc23d0d95b5cde76d0f8473eabc03ca82a862e
Summary:
Changes `react-native/babel-plugin-codegen` to generate calls to `NativeComponentRegistry` instead of `registerGeneratedViewConfig`.
The only notable changes in behavior from this will be:
1. In bridgeless mode, all components using `codegenNativeComponent` will no longer access `UIManager`.
2. In bridge mode, all components using `codegenNativeComponent` will no longer verify equivalence in production. Only in `__DEV__`. (This may improve performance slightly.)
This also changes the `ViewConfig` to be lazily allocated and drops support for `__INTERNAL_VIEW_CONFIG`, which we no longer need.
Changelog:
[Internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D25135881
fbshipit-source-id: ca2191872c02622ab2279b808102eeb1f664d207
Summary:
NOTE: Flow and Jest won't pass on this diff. Sandcastle, should, however, be green on D24236405 (i.e: the tip of this stack).
## Changes
Previously, the "Module" schema could either contain a `components` property, or a `nativeModules` property. The existence of the `components` property was used to determine (1) if the generators would run and (2) filter schemas on which the generators would run. Now, we simply check whether the type of the "Module" schema is `Component`.
Changelog: [Internal]
(Note: this ignores all push blocking failures!)
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D24236508
fbshipit-source-id: 68cb3f25178b6757c9a4aee767bb6173db4932a6
Summary:
Straightforward rename to clarify the purpose of this type.
The current naming made more sense before the codegen also produced code for NativeModules.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D21160793
fbshipit-source-id: 6787ef298e32ff1b4d506afd831af96764f5af6f
Summary:
This gets us on the latest Prettier 2.x:
https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html
Notably, this adds support for TypeScript 3.8,
which introduces new syntax, such as `import type`.
Reviewed By: zertosh
Differential Revision: D20636268
fbshipit-source-id: fca5833d003804333a05ba16325bbbe0e06d6c8a
Summary:
Adds schema to allow for Int32Enums in the codegen.
All of the non-schema updates here are flow fixes, the code there is implemented in the next diffs
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D17158026
fbshipit-source-id: b5a6871225771c3c97a43a901d5f8e51c44f35c8
Summary: Support a prop-type `Double`, in addition to `Float`, for flow typing and codegen of components.
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D16812812
fbshipit-source-id: b5588b3218636283a4e9c5d17212dd0b92986eb9
Summary: This diff adds ObjectTypeAnnotation to the codegen schema, throwing for the missing implementation sites added in the next diffs for easier review-ability. Also adds a schema fixture that is flow checked for review, but does not export it because the tests would fail
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D16759109
fbshipit-source-id: 75c93623e8c1ae2003c7cc638e8e3447f0e7aa38
Summary:
This uses a new helper called `dispatchCommand` that now exists on the renderer. This was added to the renderer here: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/16085
In Paper it calls UIManager.dispatchViewManagerCommand and in Fabric it calls the c++ Fabric UIManager
Reviewed By: rickhanlonii
Differential Revision: D16578708
fbshipit-source-id: 30f9468a7fd48afb506c0ee49a460b949bc863a1
Summary: This name was incorrect and didn't exist
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D16528973
fbshipit-source-id: 92b874a2b023ff89ddc4312477ab8c91c0ef2cf6
Summary: Code generators for modules and components don't have a lot of in common so there's no point to keepo them in the same directory and mix their files.
Reviewed By: rickhanlonii
Differential Revision: D16183434
fbshipit-source-id: b6ee32c6b223e8d6e4bc843b2e111598bee94dc5
