Summary:
## Motivation
We got this crash T67304907, which shows a `EXC_BAD_ACCESS / KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS` when calling this line:
```
NativeModulePerfLogger::getInstance().asyncMethodCallBatchPreprocessStart();
```
There are no arguments in that call, so I figured the only error could be when we try to invoke `getInstance()` or `asyncMethodCallBatchPreprocessStart()`.
This diff:
1. Removes the `NativeModulePerfLogger::getInstance()` bit. Now NativeModulePerfLogger is used via regular static C functions. So, there's no way that simply invoking one of the logging functions crashes the application: there's no vtable lookup.
2. Inside each logging function, when perf-logging is disabled, the global perflogger should be `nullptr`. This diff makes it so that in that case, we won't execute any code in the control group of the perf-logging experiment.
## Changes
**How do we enable NativeModule perf-logging?**
- Previously:
- `NativeModulePerfLogger::setInstance(std::make_shared<FBReactNativeModulePerfLogger>(...))`
- `TurboModulePerfLogger::setInstance(std::make_shared<FBReactNativeModulePerfLogger>(...))`.
- Now:
- `BridgeNativeModulePerfLogger::enableLogging(std::make_unique<FBReactNativeModulePerfLogger>(...))`
- `TurboModulePerfLogger::enableLogging(std::make_unique<FBReactNativeModulePerfLogger>(...))`
**How do we do NativeModule perf-logging now?**
- Previously:
- `NativeModulePerfLogger::getInstance().command(...args)`
- `TurboModulePerfLogger::getInstance().command(...args)`.
- Now:
- `BridgeNativeModulePerfLogger::command(...args)`
- `TurboModulePerfLogger::command(...args)`.
The benefit of this approach is that each method in `BridgeNativeModulePerfLogger` is guarded with an if check. Example:
```
void moduleCreateConstructStart(const char *moduleName, int32_t id) {
NativeModulePerfLogger *logger = g_perfLogger.get();
if (logger != nullptr) {
logger->moduleCreateConstructStart(moduleName, id);
}
}
```
Therefore, we don't actually execute any code when perf-logging is disabled.
Changelog:
[Internal]
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D21669888
fbshipit-source-id: 80c73754c430ce787404b563878bad146295e01f
Summary:
## Motivation
This rename will fix the following CircleCI build failures:
- [test_ios_unit_frameworks](https://circleci.com/gh/facebook/react-native/150473?utm_campaign=vcs-integration-link&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github-build-link)
- [test_ios_detox_frameworks](https://circleci.com/gh/facebook/react-native/150474?utm_campaign=vcs-integration-link&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github-build-link)
## Investigation
We have 4 podspec targets that map to the same header namespace (i.e: `header_dir`) `ReactCommon`:
- **New:** `React-perflogger`: Directory is `ReactCommon/preflogger`, and contains `NativeModulePerfLogger.{h,cpp}`.
- `React-runtimeexecutor`: Directory is `ReactCommon/runtimeexecutor`, and contains only `RuntimeExecutor.h`
- `React-callinvoker`: Directory is `ReactCommon/callinvoker`, and contains only `CallInvoker.h`
- `ReactCommon/turbomodule/core`: Directory is `ReactCommon/turbomodule`, and contains C++ files, as well has header files.
**The problem:**
We couldn't import headers from `React-perflogger` in `ReactCommon/turbomodule/core` files.
**The cause:**
I'm not entirely sure why, but I was able to discern the following two rules by playing around with the podspecs:
1. If your podspec target has a cpp file, it'll generate a framework when `USE_FRAMEWORKS=1`.
2. Two different frameworks cannot map to the same `module_name` or `header_dir`. (Why? No clue. But something breaks silently when this is the case).
So, this is what happened when I landed `React-perflogger` (D21443610):
1. The TurboModules code generates the `ReactCommon` framework that uses the `ReactCommon` header namespace.
2. `React-runtimeexecutor` and `React-callinvoker` also used the `ReactCommon` header namespace. However, neither generate a framework because of Rule 1.
3. When I comitted `React-perflogger`, I introduced a second framework that competed with the `ReactCommon` framework (i.e: TurboModules code) for the `ReactCommon` header namespace. Rule 2 violation.
## Thoughts on renaming
- `<perflogger/NativeModulePerfLogger.h>` is too generic, and the `perflogger` namepsace is used internally within FB.
- `<react/perflogger/NativeModulePerfLogger.h>` matches our fabric header format, but I'm pretty sure that slashes aren't allowed in `header_dir`: I tested this and it didn't work. IIRC, only alphanumeric and underscore are valid characters for `header_dir` or `module_name`. So, I opted to just use `reactperflogger`.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D21598852
fbshipit-source-id: 60da5d0f7758eaf13907a080b7d8756688f40723
Summary:
## Motivation
This rename will fix the following CircleCI build failures:
- [test_ios_unit_frameworks](https://circleci.com/gh/facebook/react-native/150473?utm_campaign=vcs-integration-link&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github-build-link)
- [test_ios_detox_frameworks](https://circleci.com/gh/facebook/react-native/150474?utm_campaign=vcs-integration-link&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github-build-link)
## Investigation
We have 4 podspec targets that map to the same header namespace (i.e: `header_dir`) `ReactCommon`:
- **New:** `React-perflogger`: Directory is `ReactCommon/preflogger`, and contains `NativeModulePerfLogger.{h,cpp}`.
- `React-runtimeexecutor`: Directory is `ReactCommon/runtimeexecutor`, and contains only `RuntimeExecutor.h`
- `React-callinvoker`: Directory is `ReactCommon/callinvoker`, and contains only `CallInvoker.h`
- `ReactCommon/turbomodule/core`: Directory is `ReactCommon/turbomodule`, and contains C++ files, as well has header files.
**The problem:**
We couldn't import headers from `React-perflogger` in `ReactCommon/turbomodule/core` files.
**The cause:**
I'm not entirely sure why, but I was able to discern the following two rules by playing around with the podspecs:
1. If your podspec target has a cpp file, it'll generate a framework when `USE_FRAMEWORKS=1`.
2. Two different frameworks cannot map to the same `module_name` or `header_dir`. (Why? No clue. But something breaks silently when this is the case).
So, this is what happened when I landed `React-perflogger` (D21443610):
1. The TurboModules code generates the `ReactCommon` framework that uses the `ReactCommon` header namespace.
2. `React-runtimeexecutor` and `React-callinvoker` also used the `ReactCommon` header namespace. However, neither generate a framework because of Rule 1.
3. When I comitted `React-perflogger`, I introduced a second framework that competed with the `ReactCommon` framework (i.e: TurboModules code) for the `ReactCommon` header namespace. Rule 2 violation.
## Thoughts on renaming
- `<perflogger/NativeModulePerfLogger.h>` is too generic, and the `perflogger` namepsace is used internally within FB.
- `<react/perflogger/NativeModulePerfLogger.h>` matches our fabric header format, but I'm pretty sure that slashes aren't allowed in `header_dir`: I tested this and it didn't work. IIRC, only alphanumeric and underscore are valid characters for `header_dir` or `module_name`. So, I opted to just use `reactperflogger`.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D21585006
fbshipit-source-id: e3339273af5dfd65a1454d87213d1221de6a4651
Summary:
## Description
This diff introduces `NativeModulePerfLogger`, its BUCK, Cocoapod, android-ndk targets. This diff also wires up those targets into the React Native bridge and TurboModules targets, so that we get signal on if the code compiles.
This diff also introduces `TurboModulePerfLogger`, which is a namespace that holds the `NativeModulePerfLogger` that'll do perf-logging for TurboModules.
## How will perflogging work on iOS?
1. Each application will, during React Native initialization, create a NativeModule perf logger.
2. If TurboModules are enabled, we'll call `TurboModulePerfLogger::setInstance(perfLogger)`. If TurboModules are disabled, we'll call `NativeModulePerfLogger::setInstance(perfLogger)`.
3. TurboModules, when they're created and used, will log events via `TurboModulePerfLogger::getInstance()`. NativeModules (i.e: bridge modules), when they're created and used, will log events via the `NativeModulePerfLogger::getInstance()`.
> **Note:** The NativeModule system will log events for non-TurboModules as well. Maybe we should log events for only NativeModules that conform to the `TurboModule` interface, when TurboModules are disabled. This'll ensure a fair comparison between the two systems.
## How will perflogging work on Android?
Please see the subsequent diff.
allow-large-files
Changelog:
[Both][Added] - Introduce `NativeModulePerfLogger`
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D21318053
fbshipit-source-id: 6ddf5b5a80bdc4076d2dd6588067e2b0ec8c2c6b
Ramanpreet Nara
Keegan Mendonca