Summary:
Move and create an empty rule that redirects as well, to handle //arvr rules
Need to do this way, since ovrsource sync rules are in different repo.
allow_many_files
allow-large-files
Steps:
- [X] Move glog from xplat/third-party to /third-party
- [ ] Update references in ovrsource to translate to //third-party instead of //xplat/third-party
- [ ] Get rid of temporary rule
- [ ] Update fbsource/third-party/glog to 0.3.5 (what we have in ovrsource)
Changelog: [Internal] Update reference for glog from xplat/third-party to /third-party.
Reviewed By: yfeldblum
Differential Revision: D21363584
fbshipit-source-id: c1ffe2dd615077170b03d98dcfb77121537793c9
Summary:
We need to break up the `uimanager` module in order to solve circular dependencies problem (which future diff would have otherwise).
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D20885163
fbshipit-source-id: 08eb1ba1d408fc0948e8d0da62380786a40973af
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
`ModalHostViewShadowNode` didn't have `RootNodeKit` trait, therefore `getRelativeLayoutMetrics` was including nodes in ancestors that it shouldn't have.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D20735801
fbshipit-source-id: 6b81e3b174c2f82e530abc2bca2da8bebc2270b0
Summary:
`fbsource//xplat` and `//xplat` are equivalent for FB BUCK targets. Removing extra prefix for consistency.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: scottrice
Differential Revision: D20495655
fbshipit-source-id: a57b72f694c533e2e16dffe74eccb8fdec1f55f5
Summary:
The new name is get_preprocessor_flags_for_build_mode.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: d16r
Differential Revision: D20351718
fbshipit-source-id: 67628ce81e7244f0f72af2d00d92842a649ff619
Summary:
The reason for this change is that it is the primary root that we want people to be using and the naming should reflect that.
#nocancel
build-break
overriding_review_checks_triggers_an_audit_and_retroactive_review
Changelog: [Internal]
Oncall Short Name: fbobjc_sheriff
Differential Revision: D19431128
fbshipit-source-id: c7208e20ed0f5f5eb6c2849428c09a6d4af9b6f3
Summary:
This diff changes the signature of ComponentDescriptor constructor to make it simpler and easier to support: now all arguments are passed via struct that contains all these arguments as fields.
Now the ComponentDescriptor constructor accepts three arguments one of which is optional. This causes some confusion and the possibility of bugs in all subclasses that needs to implement a custom constructor. Mostly because in every case we need to ensure that the constructor:
* Accepts and pass down all parameters/arguments;
* Accepts the right types of those parameters (shared vs weak pointers, references vs values).
* Accepts all thee arguments and pass them (including flavor!). We failed this point several times.
Overal that makes the code simpler and allows changing the set of parameters relatively easy. (There is no plan for it!)
Look at the LOC balance: less code!
Changelog: [INTERNAL]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D18548173
fbshipit-source-id: 5d038b135e004f6c054026b3235ed57db99c086d
Summary:
iOS and other platforms have direct access to C++ StateT structs, whereas Java only has access to a Java map equivalent - state updates from Java can't update complex types, or must incur significant cost to reconstruct large objects from their folly::dynamic representation (not to mention the complexity of implementing the Java-to-C++ struct converters). Thus it's hard for Java to update StateT's with complex types on the C++ side.
This diff makes a minor change to Android's updateState which uses both the folly::dynamic data from Java as well as the previous State, so each StateT can have fields that are read-only from the Java perspective.
Motivation: For AndroidTextInput we need to set params from Java, without being able to send all of the State params from Java.
In this diff, we introduce a new State constructor that takes the previous State value and a folly::dynamic. It is up to each State implementation how the additional parameter will be used.
We migrate every existing component except for AndroidTextInput in this diff.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D18672365
fbshipit-source-id: 4469e0a3c7658c204089c6fed39394979883f124
Summary:
This is the first step to migrate the registration of Android-specific `ComponentDescriptors` to `ComponentDescriptorProviderRegistry`.
`ComponentDescriptorProviderRegistry` is a never API for component registration that supports reactive registration and simplified signatures for `registry` (`add`) method.
It's tedious to keep those signatures in sync with the base class (`ComponentDescriptor`), we have an idea how to make it better by using a single struct with all params but a migration to that will be a separate effort.
The changes are pure syntactical.
Changelog: [Internal] Internal changes in Fabric.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D18010488
fbshipit-source-id: 4cbfdbcae235b32a94b38df2095c956299764e59
Summary:
`xplat` targets add different deps based on what platform the target is being built for.
for anything using `fb_xplat`, we can put all ios supermodules in `fbobjc_labels` and all android sms in `fbandroid_labels`
There's some weirdness with python targets like `thrift_gen` in `/xplat/mobileconfig/tools/generator/gen-py/BUCK` that don't have platform-specific labels because the except_for list for `fbandroid` doesn't need the `fbsource//` prefix (see changes in `/ios/isolation/infra.mobileconfig.sm`)
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: shergin, joshleibsly
Differential Revision: D17884952
fbshipit-source-id: e245364cf515b75682990094d24f789d53b1f3f5
Summary: Storing a strong shared pointer to `ComponentDescriptor` can cause a memory leak. Therefore we enforce all call sides and params to be weak pointers. The only Scheduler preserves a retaining pointer to it (to prevent preliminary deallocation).
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D17115540
fbshipit-source-id: fdea7d19f742ff04d5ba5470dd9748a5b226aa7c
Summary:
First of all, seems it's the right thing to do. Fabric C++ code is cross-platfrom and should run on *all* platforms including Windows, Linux, and Mac.
While we don't have a real *production* use cases where we need compilation for desktops, having CXX target is really handy for two reasons:
* It simplifies local test running process. Instead of going to `/fbandroid/` and executing something like `buck test fbsource//xplat/js/react-native-github/ReactCommon/fabric/core:coreAndroid` (note the suffix). We can just do `buck test fbsource//xplat/js/react-native-github/ReactCommon/fabric/core:core` everywhere and it works now out of the box. Running tests with "Apple" flavor never worked for me.
* It allows creating synthetic benchmark tests (using Google Benchmark) that can be used as a rough approximation of code micro-optimizations.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D15608678
fbshipit-source-id: d2449035685dbca6ab983480f5334ec4ac11cd35
Summary:
This diff restores the original role of StateData as a dummy class that has only one purpose - designate that there is no state associated with the node.
I believe having an abstract StateData class for all data types is not necessary and actually slightly harmful. And here the reasons:
* Having virtual dispatch enabled for classes introduces some overhead, and it should be used only if it is absolutely necessary. In this case, we don't need to have virtual dispatch enabled for Data classes because it's already enabled for State classes; therefore all virtual resolution is done there and that's sufficient. No need to pay for what we don't need.
* Continuing the previous point, yes, we expect some API being exposed for Data classes (such as `getDynamic`), but introducing a base abstract class for that is *not* an idiomatic C++ solution; in C++ it's by design that most of the template contracts are actually duck-typed. This is a well-known design issue/concern that will be addressed with an effort called "Concepts" in C++20. Anyway, we should not use abstract classes as *only* indication of conformance to some interface.
* StateData does not introduce any convenience. As it is clear from several subclass implementations, we don't really use base methods from it.
* The previous issue actually happens especially because of the interface of StateData class. Consider constructor that accepts `folly::dynamic` and does nothing, it actually useless because it's impossible to use it unless it's called inside superclass's constructor. That's the case because C++ does not support virtual dispatch for constructors (for good).
* Avoiding subclassing StateData counter-intuitively enforces the desired conformance to imaginary interface: it does not compile otherwise.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D15342338
fbshipit-source-id: 1f04f7fc5247499e7cfc09cd4b3cccffdc0b6b06
Samuel Susla
Kevin Gozali
Nikita Lutsenko
Valentin Shergin
Adam Ernst
Janette Cheng
Josh Leibsly
Joshua Gross
Andres Suarez
David Vacca