Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
There is a possibility of race between JavaScript sending "completeRoot" and maximum size set on surface. To prevent this race, we set the initial maximum size to be equal to the viewport size.
Alternative solution is to set maximumSize to {0, 0} initially instead of infinity. This is what old architecture does, even though not explicitly.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D30402207
fbshipit-source-id: 44427404eaf060a81de257797823edf971ffc1bb
Summary:
seperated -> separated
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/wiki/Changelog
-->
[Internal] [Fixed] - Fixed typo in comment
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/31067
Test Plan: NONE
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D30176244
Pulled By: sota000
fbshipit-source-id: 617607aaa7eb5f613344773c4bbbc09a8c5096c1
Summary:
Remove unused import
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/wiki/Changelog
-->
[iOS] [performance] - Remove unused import
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/30544
Test Plan: Should build on CI
Reviewed By: lunaleaps
Differential Revision: D30000901
Pulled By: charlesbdudley
fbshipit-source-id: 3d3310917823b7af57564ca1ea397cd32cd0c4d5
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/31779
For more detailed explanation, see issue https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/31779
React Native touch handler events (onTouchStart, onTouchMoved, etc..) are intended to have "force" properties when used on devices which support pressure input (3D Touch & Apple Pencil events). However, due to a check in RCTForceTouchAvailable() function which checks for UITraitCollection's "forceTouchCapability" to be equal to UIForceTouchCapabilityAvailable, the check returns NO on iPad-based devices, due to iPad devices returning UIForceTouchCapabilityUnavailable at all times. This causes "force" values of Apple Pencils to never be passed on to React Native.
Since simply passing 0 as a value for force across the RN bridge for every touch event seemed like a change that might seem jarring to some, I decided that a simple additional boolean check if the touch event's type is UITouchTypePencil (this is the same as UITouchTypeStylus) should also suffice.
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/wiki/Changelog
-->
[iOS] [Fixed] - Fixed "force" property of touch events for Apple Pencil/Stylus devices.
[iOS] [Feature] - Added "altitudeAngle" property to touch events from Apple Pencil/Stylus devices.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/31780
Test Plan:
The code compiles and runs, and trying a simple handler for a View like
````
touchMove = (e: GestureResponderEvent) => {
console.log(`pressure, altitude (${e.nativeEvent.force}, ${e.nativeEvent.altitudeAngle})`);
````
results in
<img width="424" alt="Screen Shot 2564-06-28 at 17 13 22" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5000572/123621055-0b563f00-d835-11eb-9eff-526ba27fdf7b.png">
and when pencil is oriented perpendicular to the screen and pressed with full force shows
<img width="412" alt="Screen Shot 2564-06-28 at 17 13 58" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5000572/123621139-1c06b500-d835-11eb-8207-68a49720d708.png">
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D29964102
Pulled By: sota000
fbshipit-source-id: 5a1f41d64c6fe325afbd2b9579eaf20a522e92dc
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Fabric didn't have prop [removeClippedSubviews](https://reactnative.dev/docs/view#removeclippedsubviews) implemented. This diff adds it. It is
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D29906458
fbshipit-source-id: 5851fa41d7facea9aab73ca131b4a0d23a2411ea
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Original commit changeset: fa4d8944ad6b
Not sending onScroll events events to Paper has no effect.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D29229662
fbshipit-source-id: b84a2614bfd42c64ca67ca6a1cd9d0a815c11ad0
Summary:
Previously, RCTRootView added support for minimumSize as a workaround for some initial layout use cases. Going forward, we don't need this anymore. So let's add a proxy property but log an error if anyone calls it.
Changelog: [iOS][Changed] - Proxy minimumSize to RCTSurface as a noop
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D29284227
fbshipit-source-id: 98b2dfc905c6c7e1adc03216e3a1cc3fda0a4133
Summary:
Original PR: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/31258
## Imported PR from Github:
This is a continuation of https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/29683. I've talked to danilobuerger who does not intend on continue work on it and is OK with me picking up where he left. This PR is identical besides adding a test case in the RN Tester app as requested in the original PR.
In summary it gives iOS feature parity with Android in the sense that one can use user-defined native colors, something even the docs claim is possible. It's useful as it enables accessibility features such as high contrast colors and makes implementing dark mode simple. For an example on how it can be used, see https://github.com/klarna-incubator/platform-colors
## Changelog
[iOS] [Added] - Allow PlatformColor to return user-defined named asset color
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/31258
Test Plan: Test case added to RN Tester.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D28803206
Pulled By: p-sun
fbshipit-source-id: e0f0690274799bd2d09c9f9d1a6a95ac0f979498
Summary:
Allow you to harvest the `UIAccessibilityContrastHigh` trait from iOS to show accessible colors when high contrast mode is enabled.
```jsx
// usage
PlatformColorIOS({
light: '#eeeeee',
dark: '#333333',
highContrastLight: '#ffffff',
highContrastDark: '#000000',
});
// {
// "dynamic": {
// "light": "#eeeeee",
// "dark": "#333333",
// "highContrastLight": "#ffffff",
// "highContrastDark": "#000000",
// }
// }
```
This is how apple's own dynamic system colors work under the hood (https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/ios/visual-design/color/#dynamic-system-colors)
---
The react native docs mention that more keys may become available in the future, which this PR is adding:
> In the future, more keys might become available for different user preferences, like high contrast.
https://reactnative.dev/docs/dynamiccolorios
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/wiki/Changelog
-->
[iOS] [Added] - High contrast dynamic color options for dark and light mode.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/31651
Test Plan: Added unit tests for `normalizeColor` to pass the high contrast colors downstream to RCTConvert
Reviewed By: lunaleaps
Differential Revision: D28922536
Pulled By: p-sun
fbshipit-source-id: f81417f003c3adefac50e994e62b9be14ffa91a1
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
There is a possibility of race between updating scrollview's state and virtualised list asking for layout of individual cells.
To make sure the race doesn't happen, state must be updated before dispatching onScroll event.
Android has implemented a different mechanism to tackle this issue in D28558380 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/b161241db2ef74d2e4bff36d4972f5f0312dcc44).
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D28642737
fbshipit-source-id: 33874beac69fc5a66eeb7f459fd89cd0b00dafcf
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Originally added in D17814260 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/ffc7ec992c66417039b0fa14f1afd54a9cd2f882) to make parallax effect work in Dating.
This diff hides it behind a flag so we can properly evaluate what's the cost of sending scroll events to Paper.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D28608283
fbshipit-source-id: fa4d8944ad6b5e767363e231942f13fec9d18cb5
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Extend LeakChecker so it is available on Android (or any other platform as it is completely in C++ now).
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D28600243
fbshipit-source-id: c77a003e3ffc6171e61c998508c9f34f10bb65ca
Summary:
After D28435078, NativeModules can conform to the RCTInitializing protocol, and implement the `-(void)initialize` method. This diff makes the NativeModule system execute the module's initialize method after the infra is done setting it up.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D28435430
fbshipit-source-id: 1ce00c3fb3c63b024d7e24895ff96c541a6fa654
Summary:
This protocol is no longer necessary, because we introduced the bridgeless-compatible abstraction: RCTCallJSModuleMethod.
Changelog: [iOS][Removed] - Delete RCTCallJSModuleMethod protocol
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D28395446
fbshipit-source-id: 0ad606ce7935b24bfbd6e0c2f35fbde480a8a6ff
Summary:
This diff removes all synthesize invokeJS = _invokeJS calls, and instead funnels them through synthesize callableJSModules = _callableJSModules. Now, all these NativeModules shouldn't have different branching in bridgeless mode vs bridge mode.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D28395445
fbshipit-source-id: 41a58d54c60be55e6bf5031e5417728f5eb6285c
Summary:
This diff has the bridge attach RCTCallableJSModules to our NativeModules.
Changelog: [Internal]
Differential Revision: D28395447
fbshipit-source-id: 01ca62442013826d28ba0f710e28a5963f5efb65
Summary:
This is a Bridgeless-compatible API to allow our NativeModules to call JSModule methods.
Changelog: [iOS][Added] - Introduce RCTCallableJSModules API for NativeModules
Differential Revision: D28395448
fbshipit-source-id: b7929ba8b4cc4410361961b45efa23c76baacd24
Summary:
RCTJSInvokerModule invokeJS can do the work done by setInvokeJSWithModuleDotMethod. Therefore, this diff reduces the surface area of Venice, and gets rid of setInvokeJSWithModuleDotMethod.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D28232947
fbshipit-source-id: aa0d8497a1e0fba29109ca86a39de5d9e5b10c9c
Summary:
This protocol is no longer necessary, because we migrated all our NativeModules to synthesize bundleManager = _bundleManager;
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D28232441
fbshipit-source-id: 0bd54fa49299574db8a75247c97b466476037f4f
Summary:
After this diff, every NativeModule that has `synthesize bundleManager = _bundleManager`, will get access to an RCTBundleManager, that it can use to read from/write to the bridge's bundle URL.
Changelog: [iOS][Added] - Attach RCTBundleManager to NativeModules
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D28086319
fbshipit-source-id: 6e4cd815d300e9036957ec8c743e947d2cb3f365
Summary:
## Rationale
The TurboModuleManager should only be concerned with modules. The bridge and RCTInstance integrate the TurboModuleManager with the rest of React Native. Therefore, abstractions used by TurboModules that reach into the rest of React Native should be attached by the bridge or by RCTInstance.
## Changes
In this diff, we pull RCTViewRegistry attachment out of the TurboModuleManager. In bridge mode, it'll be attached to TurboModule by the bridge. In bridgeless mode, it'll be attached to TurboModules by the RCTInstance.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D28086320
fbshipit-source-id: 9d99835bdbb66bb6a41fbd0d8a3970cefae16b81
Summary:
Previously it defaults to using transparent color (iOS default), but when using `RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView` we actually manually set to `[UIColor whiteColor]`. However, if the surface is initialized via a different API, the color wasn't set. To avoid confusion and backward incompatibility, let's just set the same background color here.
We can decide in the future if the default color should be transparent instead.
Changelog: [Fixed][iOS] RCTSurfaceHostingView default background color is now consistent with RCTRootView
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D27973748
fbshipit-source-id: c506afbc5629df6647277aa2323f084773c8e760
Summary:
To prepare for the new architecture, introduce the following enforcement:
* Defining `RCT_NEW_ARCHITECTURE` in the build flag automatically enables violation reporting
* At runtime, call RCTEnableNewArchitectureViolationReporting() to enable/disable reporting - it takes effect with the future violations
* When violation reporting is enabled:
* RCTWarnNotAllowedForNewArchitecture(): log warning about a violation, but doesn't assert
* RCTEnforceNotAllowedForNewArchitecture(): assert when a violation happen
Also in this commit:
* Add warning when RCTRegisterModule() is called as a side effect of RCT_EXPORT_MODULE(). Many modules still need this, so we can't enforce it yet.
* Add enforcement when the bridge is initialize, because the new architecture cannot have the bridge.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D27847359
fbshipit-source-id: a8c4a8151cec3915ec707ce6b78f860af4bb0708
Summary:
In order to move away from the legacy system (bridge etc), we need to decouple the new architecture assumptions from it. This flag and assertion functions will help track the runtime and report violations along the way. The goal is to have 0 violation before switching over to the pure new architecture.
Note: this is not used right now.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D27783246
fbshipit-source-id: 61f0d77c129bddcde7f24a803432f2d359c5bff3
Luna Wei
Kevin Gozali
Steven Bell
Samuel Susla
Jimmy Zhang
Ikko Ashimine
Ramanpreet Nara
Jacob Parker
CodemodService FBSourceClangFormatLinterBot
swittk
Jason Safaiyeh
Joel Arvidsson
Birkir Gudjonsson
Andres Suarez
