Summary:
* <Image> must be a leaf node; having a proper trait will fail earlier in case of misuse (mounting something inside).
* <View> must have a `View` trait because it's for what that trait is.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D21028573
fbshipit-source-id: 457716d4661333eb2357f34316f3e495ab4fda24
Summary:
Now, having `orderIndex` feature in the core, we can use it for implementing `zIndex` feature. All we need to do is just to assign this `zIndex` value to `orderIndex`.
Then we will use this to remove some platform-specific code that implements `zIndex` on the mounting layer.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D20432155
fbshipit-source-id: b4d62b63006f45899de38e1f40b1dfbe69550ada
Summary:
This method does not have implementation and we don't use it.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D20423392
fbshipit-source-id: cfb5e4a60dbeca26a968c29d20e74dd6af0bf660
Summary:
This diff introduces two new `ShadowNodeTrait`s that we will use in the future in the new (slightly tweaked) view-flattening algorithm. (Note: this diff does not enable the new flattening, it's just preparation.)
The idea is that we split the notion of `isLayoutOnlyView` into two traits:
* `FormsView`: `ShadowNode`s with this trait must be represented as `ShadowView`s. Normal "visible" ShadowNodes will have this trait, but "layout only views" in old nomenclature will not.
* `FormsStackingContext`: `ShadowNode`s with this thread not only must be represented as `ShadowView`s but also have to form a "stacking context" which means that their children must be mounted as `ShadowView`'s children.
Our implementation does not exactly follow W3C spec in terms of sets of props that create the stacking context (because of historical reasons and mobile specifics) but ideologically it's the same. We start from the very conservative implementation where only views with background-color and borders do not form stacking context and then we probably extend that to more props.
Most importantly for us now, we will enforce the absence of ``FormsStackingContext` for `ParagraphShadowNode` and the presence of `FormsView` for `TextShadowNode` on Android where it's essential for mounting layer.
Read more about stacking context here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Positioning/Understanding_z_index/The_stacking_context
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D20212253
fbshipit-source-id: 0fbaee214ce2c5886cb0232843a2a3c7bb20655d
Summary: We are moving to more stable APIs removing all mentiones of the effort name from the codebase.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D12912894
fbshipit-source-id: 4a0c6b9e7454b8b14e62d419e9e9311dc0c56e7a
Summary:
All code styles are terribly ugly. We have the only choise - choise something and embrace it.
This particular code style was borrowed from a neibour Fabric-friendly project because it follows established Facebook guides and respects client-side traditions.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D10218598
fbshipit-source-id: 8c4cf6713c07768566dadef479191661c79988f0
Summary: This change implements `onLayoutOnly` for regular bare <View> component (*not* for its descendants!) After this view flattening is actually starting working for all platforms.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9511001
fbshipit-source-id: 3562dd1b7570a064150f100cc2e1bc4220b81290
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
@public
Previously, all ConcreteShadowNode subclasses had to override `getComponentName()` function to specialize a name of the component. And often it was all that those subclasses do. Now, it's a template argument; and many ShadowNode classes can be created as oneliners via *just* specializing ConcreteShadowNode template.
Unfortunately, C++ does not allow to use `std::string`s or string literals as template arguments, but it allows to use pointers. Moreover, those pointers must point to some linked data, hence, those values must be declared in .cpp (not .h) files. For simplicity, we put those constants in Props classes, (but this is not a strong requirement).
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D8942826
fbshipit-source-id: 4fd517e2485eb8f8c20a51df9b3496941856d8a5