Summary:
NativeModuleRegistry is initialized in `ReactInstanceManager.createReactContext` and passed to the CatalystInstanceImpl's constructor. After we create the CatalystInstanceImpl, we then run the JS by calling `CatalystInstance.runJSBundle`. This makes it so that NativeModules are available by the time we run JS code that could require them.
With TurboModules, however, the JS startes executing first, and then we initialize TurboModuleManager. This is bad because by the time JS calls `TurboModuleRegistry.getEnforcing`, TurboModuleManager may yet not be ready. So, `TurboModuleRegistry.get` will just return null for all TurboModules. This will cause TurboModuleRegistry to raise errors. I suspect this is what's causing all RN surfaces to crash with "Unexpected error occurred" in prod builds of the app for users that are in the TurboModules FB4A test. But even if it doesn't fix the error, I think this is a better way to initialize TurboModules.
Reviewed By: ejanzer
Differential Revision: D16064364
fbshipit-source-id: 6053c251ace1668a331110d0cc64aba9d41a4837
Summary:
TurboModuleManager was initialized in `ReactInstanceManager.setupReactContext`, which is executed on the NativeModule thread after we call `ReactInstanceManager.createReactContext` on a new thread. `NativeModuleRegistry` is initialized in `ReactInstanceManager.createReactContext`, so if someone requests a TurboModule after `ReactInstanceManager.createReactContext` is called and before `ReactInstanceManager.setupReactContext` fully finishes executing, that TurboModule won't be found.
This diff moves TurboModuleManager initialization into `ReactInstanceManager.createReactContext`
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D15978486
fbshipit-source-id: 734e83eced414e545fe275e9a124d0df35204c40
Summary: Some TM lookup from native will fail assertion if done too early, because TM Manager is not initialized yet.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15872776
fbshipit-source-id: 7616c1424816f73a45aa1d9723e7807ae10392a7
Summary:
## Description
To initialize `TurboModuleManager`, we first need to wait until `ReactContext` is initialized. Then, we get the `TurboModuleManager` instance and assign it as the `TurboModuleRegistry` of `CatalystInstanceImpl`. This allows `CatalystInstanceImpl` to return TurboModules from its `getNativeModule` method. In `FbReactFragment`, we also wait until the `ReactContext` is initialized before then eagerly initialize a bunch of NativeModules. All this waiting is done by adding instances of `ReactInstanceEventListener` to `ReactInstanceManager`'s `mReactInstanceEventListeners` synchronized Set. When the `ReactContext` is finally initialized, we loop over this set and invoke all the listeners.
## Problem
We want to initialize `TurboModuleManager` and set it as the `TurboModuleRegistry` of `CatalystInstanceImpl` before we start eagerly initializing our NativeModules. Why? Because otherwise TurboModules that need to be eagerly initialized won't be. The fact that we're using a Set to manage the `ReactInstanceEventListener`s means that our listeners can be invoked in any order. This is bad because we can start to eagerly initialize NativeModules before we've had the chance to assign `TurboModuleManager` as the `TurboModuleRegistry` of `CatalystInstanceImpl`. In development, this race was leading to the following crash:
```
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: CombinedTP8
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: Process: com.facebook.wakizashi, PID: 10461
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: java.lang.AssertionError: Could not find module with name PrimedStorage
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.infer.annotation.Assertions.assertNotNull(Assertions.java:35)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.react.bridge.NativeModuleRegistry.getModule(NativeModuleRegistry.java:147)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.react.bridge.CatalystInstanceImpl.getNativeModule(CatalystInstanceImpl.java:444)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.fbreact.fragment.FbReactFragment$4$1.run(FbReactFragment.java:418)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:457)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.common.executors.WrappingExecutorService$1.run(WrappingExecutorService.java:82)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.common.combinedthreadpool.queue.CombinedSimpleTask.run(CombinedSimpleTask.java:81)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1162)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:636)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.common.combinedthreadpool.queue.CombinedLifetimeThreadFactory$1.run(CombinedLifetimeThreadFactory.java:40)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.common.executors.NamedThreadFactory$1.run(NamedThreadFactory.java:53)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:764)
```
## Diagnosing the crash
It looks like `NativeModuleRegistry.getModule` was throwing an error because `PrimedStorage` was null. `PrimedStorage` was turned into a TurboModule, so of course it wouldn't be in the `NativeModuleRegistry`. It should be in the `TurboModuleRegistry`. So, I placed an assertion in `CatalystInstanceImpl`:
```
Override
public NativeModule getNativeModule(String moduleName) {
Assertions.assertNotNull(mTurboModuleRegistry, "TurboModuleRegsitry is not null");
if (mTurboModuleRegistry != null) {
TurboModule turboModule = mTurboModuleRegistry.getModule(moduleName);
if (turboModule != null) {
return (NativeModule)turboModule;
}
}
return mNativeModuleRegistry.getModule(moduleName);
}
```
Sure enough, this assertion started tripping, which meant that `mTurboModuleRegistry` was null. From this information, I hypothesized that we started to eagerly initialize our NativeModules before `TurboModuleManager` was initialized. To verify this hypothesis, I added logging statements in each `ReactInstanceEventListener`: P65477469. `eagerInitializeReactNativeComponents (START)` documents when we start to eagerly intialize our NativeModules. `getReactInstanceManager (START)` documents when we start to initialize `TurboModuleManager` inside `FbReactInstanceHolder.getReactInstanceManager` method. Sure enough, when the program finally crashed, I saw in our logs that we started eagerly initializing our NativeModules before we initialized the TurboModuleManager:
```
06-05 11:11:01.951 10461 10617 V Ramanpreet: eagerInitializeReactNativeComponents (START): 1559758261951
06-05 11:11:01.956 10461 10461 V Ramanpreet: getReactInstanceManager (START): 1559758261956
06-05 11:11:01.958 10461 10461 D SoLoader: About to load: libturbomodulejsijni.so
06-05 11:11:01.960 10461 10461 D SoLoader: libturbomodulejsijni.so not found on /data/data/com.facebook.wakizashi/lib-zstd
06-05 11:11:01.960 10461 10461 D SoLoader: libturbomodulejsijni.so not found on /data/data/com.facebook.wakizashi/lib-xzs
06-05 11:11:01.960 10461 10461 D SoLoader: libturbomodulejsijni.so not found on /data/data/com.facebook.wakizashi/lib-assets
06-05 11:11:01.961 10461 10461 D SoLoader: libturbomodulejsijni.so found on /data/data/com.facebook.wakizashi/lib-main
06-05 11:11:01.965 10461 10461 D SoLoader: Loading lib dependencies: [libfb.so, libfbjni.so, libglog.so, libdouble-conversion.so, libxplat_jsi_jsiAndroid.so, libxplat_jsi_JSIDynamicAndroid.so, libfbsystrace.so, libmemalign16.so, libgnustl_shared.so, libm.so, libc.so]
06-05 11:11:01.999 10461 10769 D SoLoader: init exiting
06-05 11:11:01.999 10461 10461 D SoLoader: Loaded: libturbomodulejsijni.so
06-05 11:11:01.999 10461 10461 D SoLoader: About to load: libfb4aturbomodulemanagerdelegate.so
06-05 11:11:01.999 10461 10769 W fb4a.ImagePipelineFactory: ImagePipelineFactory has already been initialized! `ImagePipelineFactory.initialize(...)` should only be called once to avoid unexpected behavior.
06-05 11:11:02.002 10461 10461 D SoLoader: libfb4aturbomodulemanagerdelegate.so not found on /data/data/com.facebook.wakizashi/lib-zstd
06-05 11:11:02.002 10461 10461 D SoLoader: libfb4aturbomodulemanagerdelegate.so not found on /data/data/com.facebook.wakizashi/lib-xzs
06-05 11:11:02.002 10461 10461 D SoLoader: libfb4aturbomodulemanagerdelegate.so not found on /data/data/com.facebook.wakizashi/lib-assets
06-05 11:11:02.004 10461 10461 D SoLoader: libfb4aturbomodulemanagerdelegate.so found on /data/data/com.facebook.wakizashi/lib-main
06-05 11:11:02.007 10461 10461 D SoLoader: Loading lib dependencies: [libturbomodulejsijni.so, libfb.so, libfbjni.so, libxplat_jsi_jsiAndroid.so, libxplat_jsi_JSIDynamicAndroid.so, libreactnativejni.so, libmemalign16.so, libgnustl_shared.so, libc.so]
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: CombinedTP8
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: Process: com.facebook.wakizashi, PID: 10461
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: java.lang.AssertionError: Could not find module with name PrimedStorage
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.infer.annotation.Assertions.assertNotNull(Assertions.java:35)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.react.bridge.NativeModuleRegistry.getModule(NativeModuleRegistry.java:147)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.react.bridge.CatalystInstanceImpl.getNativeModule(CatalystInstanceImpl.java:444)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.fbreact.fragment.FbReactFragment$4$1.run(FbReactFragment.java:418)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:457)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.common.executors.WrappingExecutorService$1.run(WrappingExecutorService.java:82)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.common.combinedthreadpool.queue.CombinedSimpleTask.run(CombinedSimpleTask.java:81)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1162)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:636)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.common.combinedthreadpool.queue.CombinedLifetimeThreadFactory$1.run(CombinedLifetimeThreadFactory.java:40)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at com.facebook.common.executors.NamedThreadFactory$1.run(NamedThreadFactory.java:53)
06-05 11:11:02.020 10461 10617 E AndroidRuntime: at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:764)
06-05 11:11:02.038 1647 1667 I WifiService: requestActivityInfo uid=1000
06-05 11:11:02.038 1647 1667 I WifiService: reportActivityInfo uid=1000
06-05 11:11:02.038 1647 1667 I WifiService: getSupportedFeatures uid=1000
06-05 11:11:02.044 1647 1667 E BluetoothAdapter: Bluetooth binder is null
06-05 11:11:02.049 1647 1667 E KernelCpuSpeedReader: Failed to read cpu-freq: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state (No such file or directory)
06-05 11:11:02.050 1647 1667 E BatteryExternalStatsWorker: modem info is invalid: ModemActivityInfo{ mTimestamp=0 mSleepTimeMs=0 mIdleTimeMs=0 mTxTimeMs[]=[0, 0, 0, 0, 0] mRxTimeMs=0 mEnergyUsed=0}
06-05 11:11:02.057 2147 10435 W ctxmgr : [AclManager]No 2 for (accnt=account#-517948760#, com.google.android.gms(10013):IndoorOutdoorProducer, vrsn=13280000, 0, 3pPkg = null , 3pMdlId = null , pid = 2147). Was: 3 for 57, account#-517948760#
06-05 11:11:02.077 10461 10461 D SoLoader: Loaded: libfb4aturbomodulemanagerdelegate.so
06-05 11:11:02.079 10461 10461 V Ramanpreet: getReactInstanceManager (END): 1559758262079
```
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15676746
fbshipit-source-id: a7ac02d868abf31c5d664b10f70b6db247f388f5
Summary:
Every call site is either already using `createReactContextInBackground` correctly or guarding the invocation using `hasStartedCreatingInitialContext`. This is an unnecessary and overly complex dance that can be simplified.
This revision simplifies the use of `createReactContextInBackground` by integrating the check. This is not a breaking change.
Reviewed By: zackargyle, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15566632
fbshipit-source-id: 7b50285c9ac6776d1297d2c9c53dff208851b722
Summary:
We currently have two different codepaths for actually rendering a surface with Fabric on iOS and Android: on iOS we use Fabric's `UIManagerBinding.startSurface` to call `AppRegistry.runApplication`, but on Android we don't; instead we use the same codepath as paper, calling `ReactRootView.runApplication`.
This diff does a few different things:
1. Unify iOS and Android by removing the `#ifndef` for Android so that we call `startSurface` for both
2. Pass through the JS module name on Android so that this actually works (it currently passes in an empty string)
3. Remove the call to `ReactRootView.runApplication` for Fabric so that we don't end up doing this twice
4. Copy over some logic that we need from `ReactRootView.runApplication` (make sure that root layout specs get updated, and that content appeared gets logged)
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15501666
fbshipit-source-id: 5c96c8cf036261cb99729b1dbdff0f7c09a32d76
Summary:
## Summary
People use `ReactPackage` instances to create NativeModules. To make the migration from NativeModule to TurboModule easy, I'm introducing a `TurboModuleManagerDelegate` that understands `ReactPackage`s, and uses them to lookup and create the Java TurboModule objects. This way, we don't have to change the way we declare NativeModules for the migration.
## TurboModule registration
Each application should have its own subclass of `ReactPackageTurboModuleManagerDelegate`. This subclass is a hybrid class with a C++ and a Java part. The Java part can (and probably should) do nothing (for now). The C++ part has to implement the `moduleName -> jni::HostObject` and `moduleName, javaInstance -> jni::HostObject` functions for all TurboModules in the application.
**Use Case: Migrating a NativeModule to TurboModule system**
1. Make the Java NativeModule extend `TurboModule`. (The reason why this doesn't happen automatically is probably because we haven't changed the Java codegen yet).
2. Modify the `moduleName -> jni::HostObject` or `moduleName, javaInstance -> jni::HostObject` functions to return the `TurboModule`.
**Use Case: Adding a new TurboModule**
1. Add the TurboModule to a `ReactPackage` in the application.
2. Modify the `moduleName -> jni::HostObject` or `moduleName, javaInstance -> jni::HostObject` functions to return the TurboModule `jsi::HostObject`.
**Note:** It's also possible to declare TurboModules by overriding the `getModule(String moduleName)` function of `ReactPackageTurboModuleManagerDelegate`. It's not a good idea, because it'll make switching between the NativeModule/TurboModule system difficult.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15209129
fbshipit-source-id: 4b0a303595145be9b19d6f4934f956b91990f859
Summary: Remove dependency on ReactRootView in ReactInstanceManager by creating a rough interface (ReactRoot) so that either a Surface or ReactRootView can be attached to ReactInstanceManager.
Reviewed By: ejanzer, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14158890
fbshipit-source-id: b7ab4654b1e0ef8343230a3c15023653a7f23a4b
Summary:
This diff migrates RN to AndroidX.
As part of this diff I disabled few tests in RNAndroid OSS that will be re-enabled this week. As part of the refactor of BUCK files in OSS
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D14200097
fbshipit-source-id: 932fcae251d1553e672acd67ecd0e703dcb364aa
Summary: Flesh out how surface will be used with a flag in ReactRootView
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14112897
fbshipit-source-id: adf6078048dbf83452d3523f0530a4d6dca7b3e8
Summary: Due to the way (initial) surface implementation plays with ReactRootView (RRV), the react tag from the UIManagerModule is now set on the surface container view rather than on RRV as it was historically done. RRV still caches the react tag but just doesn't use it as an id on the view so `RRV.getViewId()` no longer equals `RRV.getReactTag()`.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14110104
fbshipit-source-id: 6dbcc41c85fd7a6c32c7250f68f4a84bed4e075a
Summary:
Yet another issue with mAttachedRootViews. Every time attachRootView is called, the root view's id is reset to NO_ID. However, there can be a case where the react context has not initialized yet, so we delay attaching the root view to the instance manager until setupReactContext. If attachRootView was called a second time before the react context has finished initializing, we end up in a situation where we try to attach the same root view twice
I'm planning to remove mAttachedRootViews all together in a future diff, but for now let's avoid these crashes.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D12835167
fbshipit-source-id: ebef3fadc5f9f467eebb3b5644c685acc5ea10bf
Summary:
When RN starts up, it lowers the default priority of the JS thread. This diff sets a point to see when the JS thread priority is lowered.
In subsequent diffs, we will be able to use this marker to play around with bumping the priority of the JS thread till TTI is done.
Reviewed By: alexeylang
Differential Revision: D8965457
fbshipit-source-id: 87cb1e3d3b370af183f388c411fd9a87a6cba250
Summary:
D12829677 introduced a deadlock where onHostResume holds the lock on `moveToResumedLifecycleState()` then waits for the `mReactContext` lock, but at the same time setupReactContext holds the `mReactContext` lock and waits for `moveToResumedLifecycleState()` https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/everpaste/?handle=GAgXFgLQH1ZlQikBAMQzo2LZ6h9TbiAxAAAz. The purpose of the previous diff was to make sure that detachRootoView and
setupReactContext did not interfere with each other, and implemented that by blocking on mReactContext. Since this overloads the usage of mReactContext, let's use a different lock `mAttachedRootViews` to implement this behavior instead
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D12989555
fbshipit-source-id: c12e5fd9c5fa4c2037167e9400dc0c1578e38959
Summary: This diff fixes exception handling for Mounting of views, as soon as there is an exception we stop the mounting of views because from that point the UI View tree is going to be inconsistent with the ReactShadow tree from C++. We also stop the mounting of views when the host is paused, this allows us to not keep mounting views
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D10510334
fbshipit-source-id: b0d3eba580ff92d8b8400244ec9d7c266db42ff9
Summary:
It works great on iOS, and mostly works on Android, and is now OTA'able as part of the screen config! Haven't done template view yet. One remaining issue:
Layout is borked on Android. I'm guessing the issue has to do with the timing of setting the constraints in `updateRootLayoutSpecs` and calling `mBinding.startSurface` which actually builds the shadow tree. If I try to call `updateRootLayoutSpecs` earlier, it just crashes immediately. Here's the layout it spits out, which clearly has -440 for the x of 420006, which is the RCTText component, causing it to get cut off on the left of the screen:
```
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420006 x: -440, y: -13, width: 931, height: 78
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420010 x: 26, y: 79, width: 0, height: 1651
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420012 x: 0, y: 26, width: 0, height: 158
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420016 x: 0, y: 210, width: 454, height: 454
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420018 x: 454, y: 210, width: 455, height: 454
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420022 x: 0, y: 690, width: 454, height: 454
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420024 x: 454, y: 690, width: 455, height: 454
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420028 x: 0, y: 1171, width: 454, height: 454
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420030 x: 454, y: 1171, width: 455, height: 454
updateLayoutMountItem for reactTag: 420032 x: 0, y: 1651, width: 0, height: 0
```
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D12813192
fbshipit-source-id: 450d646af4883ff25184141721351da67b091b7c
Summary:
There are multiple reports of the NativeViewHierarchyManager trying to remove a root view with id -1. This can occur because of a race condition caused by calls to startReactApplication + unmountReactApplication.
We unfortunately overload overload the id field of the ReactRootView to store its react tag. This id is typically set when the view is attached to the react instance, and reset to NO_ID right before an attach occurs or when the react context is tearing down. If the react context has already been initialized, attaching the root view is synchronous and the id is set immediately. If the context has not been initialized, we save the root view in a mAttachedRootViews list and wait until setupReactContext (where the context is created) to finish attaching the root views.
There were two issues:
1) In setupReactContext, synchronizing on mReactContextLock is not enough to ensure that the root views in mAttachedRootViews have been initialized already
2) In detachRootView, removing the root view from mAttachedRootViews immediately will cause mAttachedRootViews to be out of sync when it is accessed by the time it is accessed in setupReactContext
To address these, the mReactContextLock will synchronize both the creation of the react context AND the initialization of the root views and detachRootView will synchronize on the mReactContextLock before mutating the mAttachedRootViews list.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D12829677
fbshipit-source-id: 3f3b0669e5be2b570c9d534503d04e5d0816196b
Summary: UIImplementationProvider was removed as part of D8650376, this was a breaking change that caused problems in OSS. This diff introduces the concept of a deprecated UIImplementationProvider again to allow OSS community to upgrade to latest version of RN.
Reviewed By: achen1
Differential Revision: D10456317
fbshipit-source-id: 6817629524f927dfcb5ebc054dbfd983877b7606
Summary: This diff avoids deleting all the views of ReactRootView when the ReactContext is destroyed (ONLY FOR FABRIC). In Fabric these views are removed and deleted by the framework when the ReactShadowNode is destroyed.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D10319737
fbshipit-source-id: 2e2d2599006cd8205e0153c18cd75383387ce1df
Summary: Just a small diff to remove some unused parameters in some methods of the ReactInstnaceManager class
Reviewed By: achen1
Differential Revision: D10011168
fbshipit-source-id: 2247ecd01bfc63c27837c6abad4bff1b4e590ac0
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary: Adding a QPL point for initializing Hermes to both (MP) HOME_TTI and (RN) CORE.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9725795
fbshipit-source-id: 673f54950a2d9ebfa496a000a0d47aabf290bfc8
Summary:
Added systrace to the following sections
1. When Marketplace Home Fragment is created
2. On initialization of Catalyst Instance
Reviewed By: achen1
Differential Revision: D9665376
fbshipit-source-id: e48e9f50dad42c71fb2151538f65bc54939adc1e
Summary: tired of looking around for this thread. named it "create_react_context"
Differential Revision: D9664714
fbshipit-source-id: 8839b5724fe2516fc46de3dd40971c52a5a8168f
Summary:
- Differentiate when the constants are coming from lazy view managers or not
- Add systrace sections to each reactpackage iteration for lazy view managers
Differential Revision: D9664719
fbshipit-source-id: 3b8c6b3b40667a833471fcb957367501781b0f5d
Summary:
When running Systrace, we currently only surface the JavaScript bundle that is pre-packaged in the binary.
This changes `ReactInstanceManager` so that we prefer a cached bundle if one exists. This allows running Systrace with local changes (as long as you load them into the client before running Systrace).
Differential Revision: D9389704
fbshipit-source-id: 031321b2e07539efc7f47a7c6947ab7b82dc7dfc
Summary: The method removes all settings for mLazyReactModules since Lazy and non lazy modules can exist in a single application now
Reviewed By: achen1
Differential Revision: D9012312
fbshipit-source-id: 0420149654f8146453250d83d4de4b4c2fd31e9f
Summary:
@public
Apps may need to listen for custom commands via the packager connection. This allows registering such listeners.
Reviewed By: raluca-elena
Differential Revision: D8654477
fbshipit-source-id: 5f17298a88fec31b8939236fef48ee46c0ba2ee8
Summary:
@public
This diff deprecates and deletes the UIImplementationProvider class.
It is not required to create an UIImplementation provider anymore, from now on the UIImplementation is created inside the UIManagerModule.
If you are using the UIImplementationProvider to create a ReactInstanceManager
e.g.:
```
ReactInstanceManager =
getReactInstanceManagerBuilder()
...
.setUIImplementationProvider(...)
...
.build();
```
Then you should just remove that line:
```
ReactInstanceManager =
getReactInstanceManagerBuilder()
.set.....
.build();
```
Reviewed By: achen1
Differential Revision: D8650376
fbshipit-source-id: 8d883295d8bf6578a99685edf6a2a84c6d0df0cf
Summary:
Adds support for native clients to `ReactAndroid`:
- `.devsupport.BundleDeltaClient` is now abstract with two implementations: the existing Java client, and a native client
- `BundleDeltaClient#processDelta(...)` can now return a native delta client object
- if that client object is non-null, the bridge is started up with that client rather than a script written to disk
Reviewed By: fromcelticpark
Differential Revision: D7845135
fbshipit-source-id: 379a9c6f9319c62eec3c370cda9ffa0969266a29
Summary: Adds the name of the active JS executor when logging the `CREATE_REACT_CONTEXT_START` marker.
Reviewed By: fromcelticpark
Differential Revision: D7800760
fbshipit-source-id: d5090a9f90cf4b7bcfb7218e75621becebd70675
Summary:
Before, any calls to ReactContext would either use the default DevSupportManager's exception handler in debug mode OR throw exceptions immediately in non debug mode. In order to intercept these kinds of native exceptions, we should reuse the NativeModuleCallExceptionHandler provided by the ReactInstanceManager. For those who don't specify a NativeModuleCallExceptionHandler, the resulting behavior remains the same. For those who do specify a NativeModuleCallExceptionHandler,
the main difference is that it will now be responsible for handling exceptions for ReactContext.handleException
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D7641772
fbshipit-source-id: 8f175df687723fcbb8a7620f90d8a08c94798738
Ramanpreet Nara
Kevin Gozali
Krzysztof Borowy
Tim Yung
Emily Janzer
Luna Wei
David Vacca
Andrew Chen (Eng)
Ram N
Spencer Ahrens
Héctor Ramos
Jiaqi Wu
Marc Horowitz
David Aurelio
Dmitry Zakharov