Summary:
This PR updates `RCTMountingTransactionObserving` protocol to accept full `MountingTransaction` object as an argument to its methods as opposed to just `MountingTransactionMetdata` which contained only some subset of information.
This change makes it possible for components implementing the protocol to analyze the list of mutations and hence only take action when certain mutations are about to happen.
One of the use cases for `RCTMountingTransactionObserving` protocol is to allow for Modal to take view snapshot before it is closed, such that an animated close transition can be performed over the snapshotted content. Note that when modal is removed from the view hierarchy its children are gone too and therefore the snapshot mechanism makes it possible for children to still be visible while the animated closing transition is ongoing. A similar use-case to that can be seen in react-native-screens library, where we use the same snapshot mechanism for views that are removed from navigation stack.
Before this change, we'd use `mountingTransactionDidMountWithMetadata` to take a snapshot. However, making a snapshot of relatively complex view hierarchy can be expensive, and we'd like to make sure that we only perform a snapshot when the given modal is about to be removed. Because the mentioned method does not provide an information about what changes are going to be performed in a given transaction, we'd make the snapshot for every single view transaction that happens while the modal is mounted.
In this PR we're updating `RCTMountingTransactionObserving` protocol's methods, in particular, we rename methods to no longer contain "Metadata" in them and to accept `MountingTransaction` as the only argument instead of `MountingTransactionMetadata` object. With this change we are also deleting `MountingTransactionMetadata` altogether as it has no uses outside the protocol. Finally, we update the two uses of the protocol in `RCTScrollViewComponentView` and `RCTModalHostViewComponentView`.
## Changelog
[iOS][Fabric] - Update RCTMountingTransactionObserving protocol to consume MountingTransaction objects
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/33510
Test Plan:
As there are not that many uses of `RCTMountingTransactionObserving` protocol during testing I focused on checking if the updated method is called and if the provided objects contains the proper data. Unfortunately, despite code for the modal protocol being present in OSS version it does seem like some parts of modal implementation are still missing and the component only renders an unimplemented view (checked this with rn-tester). I only managed to verify the use in `RCTScrollViewComponentView` with the following steps:
1. Build for iOS
2. Put a breakpoint in mountingTransactionDidMount method in `RCTScrollViewComponentView.mm`
3. Verify that the program stops on the breakpoint when a scrollview is rendered (use any screen on rn-tester app)
4. Inspect the provided object in the debugger (ensure the list of transactions is not empty)
Outside of that we verified the transactions can be processed in `mountingTransactionDidMount` after the changes from this PR are applied in FabricExample app in [react-native-screens](https://github.com/software-mansion/react-native-screens/tree/main/FabricExample) repo.
Reviewed By: cipolleschi
Differential Revision: D35214478
Pulled By: ShikaSD
fbshipit-source-id: f40afc512f2c8cfa6262d2fb82fb1ccb05aa734c
Summary:
We need to do this to break a dependency cycle that would happen if we try to have `view` depend on `mounting` just to add some telemetry to `view`.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D26827446
fbshipit-source-id: 4c415ebf5be3a02c18c80ea8a4a77068cae0f0fe
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
There are two exceptions inside `TelemetryController::pullTransaction`:
- Empty Optional cannot be unwrapped
- mutex lock failed: Invalid argument
By marking this method `noexcept`, stack trace is lost and it makes it more difficult to track down the issue.
What does compiler do if a method is marked `noexcept`?
```
void f() noexcept {
try {
// do work
}
catch (...) {
std::terminate(); // This is the std::terminate() we are seeing in stack traces.
}
}
```
Removing noexcept specifier might give us more information about the exception.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D24477861
fbshipit-source-id: 80f26e9ab160a5330c2848b89a01d60bfc0a4611
Summary:
Just renaming, nothing more.
The idea of MountingTelemetry already grown to something bigger than just mounting telemetry, so we are renaming it.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D23374947
fbshipit-source-id: f60ce38b75d1ce77498b84688e59598314c69a78
Summary:
This diff moves fabric C++ code from ReactCommon/fabric to ReactCommon/react/renderer
As part of this diff I also refactored components, codegen and callsites on CatalystApp, FB4A and venice
Script: P137350694
changelog: [internal] internal refactor
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D22852139
fbshipit-source-id: f85310ba858b6afd81abfd9cbe6d70b28eca7415
Oleksandr Melnykov
Krzysztof Magiera
Samuel Susla
Andres Suarez
Valentin Shergin
David Vacca