Summary:
This PR bumps bumps Soloader to 0.8.0. This fixes white screen/ crash issues when downloading from Google Play.
Related to:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/25927#26400
## Changelog
[Android] [Changed] - Bump Soloader to 0.8.0
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/26759
Test Plan:
A few CI tests fail, but I don't see the link with what I changed, especially the ios tests.
It's working locally though, and for people on github who tried this solution as well.
Differential Revision: D17828891
Pulled By: mdvacca
fbshipit-source-id: 1c7809aa681b41b8ed9a4da96d041d52f3cfbb76
Summary:
Reland https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/24767
The commit had to be reverted because it caused a crash when using remote debugging in chrome. This is normal since jsi is not available in that environment. The crash was caused by `jsContext.get()` being 0, then being dereferenced later in c++. We can simply skip initializing the blob collector in this case.
This also includes the fix from https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/25720 to fix a crash when using hermes.
## Changelog
[Android] [Fixed] - Release underlying resources when JS instance is GC'ed on Android
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/26155
Test Plan:
Test using RN tester with jsc and hermes
Test remote debugging
Reviewed By: mdvacca, fred2028
Differential Revision: D17072644
Pulled By: makovkastar
fbshipit-source-id: 079d1d43501e854297fbbe586ba229920c892584
Summary:
## Motivation
I have seen a spike in users reporting this error. Unfortunately I did not receive any repros that would confirm this, but my hypothesis is that they ran into situation when `new XYZPackage()` was present in `getPackages()` method and then the CLI kicked in with autolinking and they were left with this incomplete error.
someone more knowledgeable of autolinking should review this.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/26467
Differential Revision: D17661242
Pulled By: cpojer
fbshipit-source-id: 63dfcd85a0d41d85a0dd52f84ab16cb7ceb64ba2
Summary:
This change restores the possibility of injecting custom root views via ReactAcitivtyDelegate. It has been used by react-native-gesture-handler library in order to replace default root view with a one that'd route touch events to gesture-handler internal pipeline.
The regression happened in d0792d4b8a where new `ReactDelegate` was introduced to provide support for rendering react native views in both Android fragments and activities. As a part of that change the logic responsible for creating root view has been moved from `ReactActivityDelegate` to `ReactDelegate` rendering `ReactActivityDelegate.createRootView` unused – that is there is no code path that leads to this method being called. Instead `ReactDelegate.createRootView` method has been added which now plays the same role. The custom root view injection was relying on overwriting that method and hence the method is no longer referenced overwriting it has no effect. Following the logic migration out of `ReactActivityDelegate` into `ReactDelegate` we could potentially now start overwriting methods of `ReactDelegate`. However when working with Android's activities in React Native we can only provide an instance of `ReactActivityDelegate` and in my opinion it does not make too much sense to expose also a way to provide own instance of `ReactDelegate`.
The proposed fix was to route `ReactDelegate.createRootView` to call `ReactActivityDelegate.createRootView` and this way regaining control over root view creation to `ReactActivityDelgate`. The change of the behavior has been implemented by subclassing `ReactDelegate` directly from `ReactActivityDelegate` and hooking the aforementioned methods together. Thanks to this approach, the change has no effect on `ReactDelegate` being used directly from fragments or in other scenarios where it is not being instantiated from `ReactActivityDelegate`.
This fixes an issue reported in https://github.com/kmagiera/react-native-gesture-handler/issues/745 and discussed on 0.61 release thread: https://github.com/react-native-community/releases/issues/140#issuecomment-532235945
## Changelog
[Internal] [Fixed] - Allow for custom root view to be injected via ReactActivityDelegate
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/26495
Test Plan:
1. Run RNTester, take layout snapshot, see the react root view being on the top of view hierarchy.
2. Run gesture-handler Example app (or some other app that overwrites ReactActivityDelegate.createRootView method), on layout snapshot see custom root view being used.
Differential Revision: D17482966
Pulled By: mdvacca
fbshipit-source-id: 866f551b8b077bafe1eb9e34e5dccb1240fa935e
Summary:
There have been multiple complaints about combining RN with various
other FB libraries, including Litho and Flipper, because of bundled dependencies
that can't be deduplicated by Gradle.
This is one of three current conflicts:
1) Proguard annotations (this PR)
2) Yoga
3) fbjni
While the Yoga group name doesn't make a massive amount of sense
it was the easiest existing package to use and since we don't
have a better namespace for this, we might as well use this.
A similar change to Litho is landing right now.
## Changelog
[Android] [Changed] - Use centralized package for DoNotStrip annotation
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/26069
Test Plan:
```
yarn
./gradlew :RNTester:android:app:assembleDebug
```
Reviewed By: cpojer
Differential Revision: D16827430
Pulled By: passy
fbshipit-source-id: 87542b5422fee598d8e635651441f0ecd42eb9d7
Summary: The OnLoad.cpp file is needed since it actually registers the jni functions, it wasn't included in the build so it wasn't working correctly.
Reviewed By: jbower-fb
Differential Revision: D16826230
fbshipit-source-id: 0243e456c4015879d17650737a6a27a58a3d0d9a
Summary: This diff adds a feature flag which must be enabled if view managers should be allowed to use a delegate for setting their properties.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D16762876
fbshipit-source-id: ae3466d7f02ed02f203dbb79f5e0843e6d9fdd45
Summary: ModuleRegistryBuilder does as assertion to verify that all `cxxModules` are instances of `CxxModuleWrapperBase::javaStaticClass()`. This assertion is causing the crash in T48554656. Since we don't know which NativeModule is causing this problem, it's difficult to get to the bottom of this. So, for now, I'm improving the assertion message in the hopes that it helps us get to the bottom of this issue.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D16774711
fbshipit-source-id: 82318b8ff5ab735ae642da81777c1b5588e8a483
Summary:
This diff introduces an interface `ViewManagerDelegate` and its base implementation `BaseViewManagerDelegate`, which is used as a parent class for all view manager delegates generated by the JS codegen. Before the changes in this diff, generated delegates didn't support setting the base view properties such as background color, rotation, opacity, etc. Now it's possible to do by using `BaseViewManagerDelegate.setProperty(...)`, and since all generated delegates extend BaseViewManagerDelegate, they can just call `super.setProperty(...)` for properties they don't want to handle.
This diff also introduced a new method `ViewManager.getDelegate()`. This will allow view managers to return an instance of the delegate generated by JS and ensure that the view properties are set in a type-safe manner. If this method returns null (it does by default), we fall back to the default implementation of setting view properties using Java-generated `$$PropsSetter`
classes.
This is an example of an interface class generated by JS:
```
public interface RCTAxialGradientViewViewManagerInterface<T extends View> {
void setColors(T view, Nullable ReadableArray value);
void setLocations(T view, Nullable ReadableArray value);
void setEndX(T view, Float value);
void setEndY(T view, Float value);
void setStartX(T view, Float value);
void setStartY(T view, Float value);
}
```
This is an example of a delegate class generated by JS:
```
public class RCTAxialGradientViewManagerDelegate<T extends View, U extends BaseViewManager<T, ? extends LayoutShadowNode> & RCTAxialGradientViewManagerInterface<T>> extends BaseViewManagerDelegate<T, U> {
public RCTAxialGradientViewManagerDelegate(U viewManager) {
super(viewManager);
}
Override
public void setProperty(T view, String propName, Nullable Object value) {
switch (propName) {
case "colors":
mViewManager.setColors(view, (ReadableArray) value);
break;
case "locations":
mViewManager.setLocations(view, (ReadableArray) value);
break;
case "endX":
mViewManager.setEndX(view, value == null ? Float.NaN : ((Double) value).floatValue());
break;
case "endY":
mViewManager.setEndY(view, value == null ? Float.NaN : ((Double) value).floatValue());
break;
case "startX":
mViewManager.setStartX(view, value == null ? Float.NaN : ((Double) value).floatValue());
break;
case "startY":
mViewManager.setStartY(view, value == null ? Float.NaN : ((Double) value).floatValue());
break;
default:
super.setProperty(view, propName, value);
}
}
}
```
NOTE: What if a view manager, for instance ReactAxialGradientManager, wanted to add support for the borderRadius prop? In the old Java codegen, it would just need to create a method and annotate it with ReactProp (name = ViewProps.BORDER_RADIUS) and $$PropsSetter would call this method when a property with this name must be set. With the new JS codegen, borderRadius is a part of the basic view props, so setBorderRadius is not generated as a part of the ViewManagerInterface, so it’s not possible to set this value. I see two options: 1) add a method boolean setProperty (String propName, Object value) and let the view manager handle it in a non-type safe way (return true if it’s been handled). 2) Generate BaseViewManagerInterface which will include all basic view props and make BaseViewManager implement this interface, leaving all methods empty so that it stays compatible with the current implementation. Override these methods in a view manager that needs to handle a specific property in a custom way (so we would override setBorderRadius in ReactAxialGradientManager).
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D16667686
fbshipit-source-id: 06a15a92f8af55640b7a53c5a34f40366d1be2a8
Summary:
Changing showSoftKeyboard and hideSoftKeyboard to be protected, as we need this change for an internal control that extends ReactEditText.
## Changelog
[Android] [Changed] - part of our react native platform, we have a control that extends ReactEditText and we need to be able to override these 2 methods.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/25964
Test Plan: The change has been in Microsoft's branch of RN for almost 2 years, and since it's a relatively small change we've done a quick sanity check in RNTester prior to this PR, making sure the TextInput page loads fine and it's functional.
Differential Revision: D16686878
Pulled By: cpojer
fbshipit-source-id: 63035ee9c58e93bc0fa40e5bec318df05322c6c5
Summary: Some surfaces throw ConcurrentModificationException when logging detailed perf for Fabric. I've refactored the ReactMarker class to use a threadsafe ArrayList and removed synchronization, which is safer and should improve perf everywhere the markers are used, even if there are zero listeners.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D16656139
fbshipit-source-id: 34572f9ad19028a273e0837b0b895c5e8a47976a
Summary:
## The Problem
1. `CatalystInstanceImpl` indirectly holds on to the `jsi::Runtime`. When you destroy `CatalystInstanceImpl`, you destroy the `jsi::Runtime`. As a part of reloading React Native, we destroy and re-create `CatalystInstanceImpl`, which destroys and re-creates the `jsi::Runtime`.
2. When JS passes in a callback to a TurboModule method, we take that callback (a `jsi::Function`) and wrap it in a Java `Callback` (implemented by `JCxxCallbackImpl`). This Java `Callback`, when executed, schedules the `jsi::Function` to be invoked on a Java thread at a later point in time. **Note:** The Java NativeModule can hold on to the Java `Callback` (and, by transitivity, the `jsi::Function`) for potentially forever.
3. It is a requirement of `jsi::Runtime` that all objects associated with the Runtime (ex: `jsi::Function`) must be destroyed before the Runtime itself is destroyed. See: https://fburl.com/m3mqk6wt
### jsi.h
```
/// .................................................... In addition, to
/// make shutdown safe, destruction of objects associated with the Runtime
/// must be destroyed before the Runtime is destroyed, or from the
/// destructor of a managed HostObject or HostFunction. Informally, this
/// means that the main source of unsafe behavior is to hold a jsi object
/// in a non-Runtime-managed object, and not clean it up before the Runtime
/// is shut down. If your lifecycle is such that avoiding this is hard,
/// you will probably need to do use your own locks.
class Runtime {
public:
virtual ~Runtime();
```
Therefore, when you delete `CatalystInstanceImpl`, you could end up with a situation where the `jsi::Runtime` is destroyed before all `jsi::Function`s are destroyed. In dev, this leads the program to crash when you reload the app after having used a TurboModule method that uses callbacks.
## The Solution
If the only reference to a `HostObject` or a `HostFunction` is in the JS Heap, then the `HostObject` and `HostFunction` destructors can destroy JSI objects. The TurboModule cache is the only thing, aside from the JS Heap, that holds a reference to all C++ TurboModules. But that cache (and the entire native side of `TurboModuleManager`) is destroyed when we call `mHybridData.resetNative()` in `TurboModuleManager.onCatalystInstanceDestroy()` in D16552730. (I verified this by commenting out `mHybridData.resetNative()` and placing a breakpoint in the destructor of `JavaTurboModule`). So, when we're cleaning up `TurboModuleManager`, the only reference to a Java TurboModule is the JS Heap. Therefore, it's safe and correct for us to destroy all `jsi::Function`s created by the Java TurboModule in `~JavaTurboModule`. So, in this diff, I keep a set of all `CallbackWrappers`, and explicitly call `destroy()` on them in the `JavaTurboModule` destructor. Note that since `~JavaTurboModule` accesses `callbackWrappers_`, it must be executed on the JS Thread, since `createJavaCallbackFromJSIFunction` also accesses `callbackWrappers_` on the JS Thread.
For additional safety, I also eagerly destroyed the `jsi::Function` after it's been invoked once. I'm not yet sure if we only want JS callbacks to only ever be invoked once. So, I've created a Task to document this work: T48128233.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D16623340
fbshipit-source-id: 3a4c3efc70b9b3c8d329f19fdf4b4423c489695b
Summary: This diff implements the JSResponderHandler methods in the core of RN (scheduler API and friends)
Reviewed By: ejanzer
Differential Revision: D16543437
fbshipit-source-id: dac03e30c4330d182ecf134f3174ba942dbf7289
Summary:
This diff adds the new API required to implment JSResponderHandler in FabricUIManager
The new API differs from the old API, but since setJSResponder is called ONLY from JS it's not necessary to have this method as part of UIManager interface.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D16543440
fbshipit-source-id: ca4bd4c1e4df706cda0eb16798e01f3350558d06
Summary: When you create a TurboModule from the JS side, we instantiate its Java class and simply make this `javaobject` a `jni::global_ref` in C++. But the reason why we need to make this a global ref is because `JavaTurboModule` needs it to be a global reference for method calls. Making this a `jni::global_ref` from the perspective to TurboModuleManager doesn't really make any sense. So, this diff refactors that bit of code.
Differential Revision: D16622133
fbshipit-source-id: 6a5c20bb405b945c06378a3423d5e7eb38ef244c
Summary:
## Description
When we reload the app, `ReactApplicationContext.destroy()` is called. This method calls `CatalystInstanceImpl.destroy()`, which (on the NativeModules thread) calls `NativeModuleRegistry.notifyJSInstanceDestroy()`, which loops over all its `ModuleHolder`s, and calls `ModuleHolder.destroy()`, each of which call their NativeModule's `onCatalystInstanceDestroy()` method.
TurboModuleManager is a `JSIModule`, so it also has its `onCatalystInstanceDestroy()` method called when the `ReactApplicationContext` is destroyed. But `TurboModuleManager.onCatalystInstanceDestroy()` doesn't do anything. Instead, at the very least, it should call `onCatalystInstanceDestroy()` of all NativeModules.
Differential Revision: D16622132
fbshipit-source-id: da29e698b5217232cfaa01e6f817aab18ceb526f
Summary: On iOS, calling the `__turboModuleProxy` function with the same name returns the same instance of the TurboModule. Adding this behaviour to Andorid as well.
Differential Revision: D16622131
fbshipit-source-id: 472011ac3356e7c30497f848be0c888596c449b1
Summary: Same as title. Changing as per suggestion.
Reviewed By: furdei
Differential Revision: D16615807
fbshipit-source-id: 1c35ae1471beb2460e975841f367ffd49ce34494
grabbou
Alaa Ben El Ahmar
Janic Duplessis
Vojtech Novak
Krzysztof Magiera
Marc Horowitz
Pascal Hartig
Rodrigo Salazar
Oleksandr Melnykov
Ram N
Ramanpreet Nara
Jakob Krigovsky
Logan Daniels
Scott Rice
Onti Vals
Joshua Gross
sunnylqm
Florian Cargoët
David Vacca
Eric Williamson
Sensen Chen
