Summary: Oleksandr made the point that making `sDidInit` volatile isn't quite enough because the flag is set at the beginning of the function; it's possible that it will return true while it's still in the process of initializing the bridge. Moving where we set the flag to the end of the function should address the issue.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D17770128
fbshipit-source-id: 695d3edc582d9dce1884d8698d400dd147ca5cae
Summary: In D17747958 I added a function to check the value of a static variable, but forgot to make sure it was accessed in a thread-safe manner. Adding `volatile` to the flag
Reviewed By: makovkastar
Differential Revision: D17763888
fbshipit-source-id: f227b69de1a0df6493424da3b276529555999f70
Summary: Adding a hook to check if ReactBridge is initialized so we can avoid loading the .so on the main thread.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D17747958
fbshipit-source-id: 5969afa57dc1b446c03bc68eaa9e1385fe17c461
Summary:
`ReactRootView.startReactApplication` takes a `Bundle` argument called `initialProperties`. This is translated to a `ReadableMap` via `Arguments.fromBundle`. If the bundle contains an array of bundles, this gets translated by `Arguments.fromArray`.
If the bundle was passed from one activity to another via intent extras, however, there is a problem. After the bundle has been marshaled and unmarshaled, the array of `Bundle`s come out the other end as an arrap of `Parcelable`s, although each array element remains a `Bundle`. This results in an "Unknown array type" exception.
This PR fixes this by adding support for `Parcelable` arrays – provided they contain only members of type `Bundle`.
## Changelog
[Android] [Fixed] - Don't throw "Unknown array type" exception when passing serialized bundle arrays in ReactRootView.startReactApplication's initialProperties parameter
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/26379
Test Plan: Added test class `ArgumentsTest`. The test method `testFromMarshaledBundle` fails when used on the old version of `Arguments`.
Differential Revision: D17661203
Pulled By: cpojer
fbshipit-source-id: 63612d78f49bdf9cc53f6f21ae883dba6cebce84
Summary:
In `CatalystInstanceImpl.destroy()`, we require the TurboModuleManager using the [following lines](https://fburl.com/diffusion/a4y6wbft):
```
final JSIModule turboModuleManager =
ReactFeatureFlags.useTurboModules
? mJSIModuleRegistry.getModule(JSIModuleType.TurboModuleManager)
: null;
```
For some strange reason, even though `ReactFeatureFlags.useTurboModules` is true, the TurboModuleManager isn't registered with mJSIModuleRegistry. I spent some time looking through the code, but I couldn't figure out why. These lines actually aren't necessary, so it's possible to fix the issue by simply working around it, which is what this diff does. We shouldn't have been double requiring the TurboModuleManager anyways, since `CatalystInstance.java` has a method to set the TurboModuleManager, which we call in `ReactInstanceManager.createReactContext`.
## Alternative approach
I could push this diff to the next cut, and instead land a diff that adds debug information to the native crash. At the cost of a week, it may help us figure out why we're seeing the crash. Thoughts? cc fkgozali
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D17636604
fbshipit-source-id: ecfff593dc6eb4ec4d5e331348b308bc7ab37966
Summary: CatalystInstanceImpl is responsible for creating the NativeModules thread. We therefore expose a method `getNativeCallInvokerHolder()` on this hybrid class to create and give us access to the `CallInvokerHolder` for the NativeModules thread.
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D17422164
fbshipit-source-id: 316423847518124115643549fa73a8533d493cd0
Summary:
## Motivation
The concept behind JSCallInvoker doesn't necessarily have to apply only to the JS thread. On Android, we need to re-use this abstraction to allow execution of async method calls on the NativeModules thread.
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D17377313
fbshipit-source-id: 3d9075cbfce0b908d800a366947cfd16a3013d1c
Summary:
We probably don't always need to crash in these cases.
This should replace all prod/dev crashes with logged SoftExceptions.
Note that this is currently only used for Fabric.
Changelog:
[Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D17170459
fbshipit-source-id: 70757ae88deb8c893b36971d879174e25a194fb9
Summary:
## Summary
When an exception is raised by Java in a synchronous call from JS to Java, the Java portion of the stack trace is simply ignored when the exception is forwarded to JS. This problem doesn't exist for async calls. I did some digging to figure out why this works with async calls, but not sync calls, to get to the bottom of T52585087.
In T52585087, `TurboModuleRegistry.get<Spec>('I18nAssets')` fails because of a `NullPointerException` in Java. However, since there's no stack trace associated with the `NullPointerException`, it's hard to diagnose the problem.
## Asynchronous calls
ReactNative's NativeModules thread is a background thread on which we schedule asynchronous NativeModule method invocations. We spawn our background threads in Java using the [`MessageQueueThreadImpl`](https://fburl.com/diffusion/u0vdm5k3). Each thread is associated with a queue on which you can schedule some work. These `MessageQueueThread`s have a [C++ API](https://fburl.com/diffusion/596740d8) that we can use to schedule some work from C++.
NativeModule method invocations in JS produce a C++/Java boundry, because our JS executes C++, which executes the Java NativeModule method. But since the method is asynchronous, instead of invoking it immediately, we wrap it in a C++ lambda and use the C++ API of `MessageQueueThread` to schedule it to be invoked later. Therefore, when it actually invokes, we'll get Java invoking C++, which invokes Java.
When the NativeModule method (implemented in Java) throws an exception, fbjni will convert that exception into a `jni::JniException` and start unwinding the C++ stack. Eventually, this exception will reach the outermost Java/C++ boundry. Typically, at this point, the program would crash, but because we used fbjni to register all our native functions, our `jni::JniException` will automatically be converted into a regular Java exception. This exception will be caught by MessageQueueThreadHandler [here](https://fburl.com/diffusion/c4thoca7), and handled using our ExceptionHandler NativeModule.
## Synchronous calls
In synchronous execution, JS uses a `JSI::HostObject` to call the Java method directly. If the Java method throws an error, because we're using fbjni, that Java exception will be converted to a `jni::JniException` object, which will contain the stack tract of the Java object. However, from what I could gather, Hermes doesn't know about `jni::JniException`. So, simply ignore the stack trace associated with the Java exception, understanding only the exception message. Hence, all synchronous calls into Java only display the JS stack trace. What we really want is to build an platform-agnostic abstraction that understands `jni::JniException` (and whatever its analogue is in iOS, if any) and use that to bridge between Native and JS.
## Temporary Solution
We know that when NativeModules are created, we do a synchronous call from JS to C++ to Java. This synchronous call happens when you do a property access on the `NativeModules` object. Therefore, at the very least, to get to the bottom of T52585087, we could log all exceptions that are thrown whenever a NativeModule is created. This should help us get to the bottom of T52585087.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D17126667
fbshipit-source-id: a6fb27aaea094b9559939ddcc260d3a2c6e71492
Summary: Support for `sendAccessibilityEvent` in the FabricUIManager.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D17142507
fbshipit-source-id: 5c131d7caa1e4189fd41ecfb558d0027394b6a15
Summary: This was an experiment to patch individual deltas in development instead of reloading the whole JS bundle. With improvements such as Fast Refresh that reduces the need for reloads and bundle splitting that reduces the number of modules and memory by 10x, we won't be needing this complex optimization that we never properly made work. This diff removes that code and I will be removing the JS side of things in Metro in a follow-up diff.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D16832709
fbshipit-source-id: 46596a3126d52d7d74f4b9ffc9a6ee9d82ec9522
Summary: Some surfaces throw ConcurrentModificationException when logging detailed perf for Fabric. I've refactored the ReactMarker class to use a threadsafe ArrayList and removed synchronization, which is safer and should improve perf everywhere the markers are used, even if there are zero listeners.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D16656139
fbshipit-source-id: 34572f9ad19028a273e0837b0b895c5e8a47976a
Summary:
## The Problem
1. `CatalystInstanceImpl` indirectly holds on to the `jsi::Runtime`. When you destroy `CatalystInstanceImpl`, you destroy the `jsi::Runtime`. As a part of reloading React Native, we destroy and re-create `CatalystInstanceImpl`, which destroys and re-creates the `jsi::Runtime`.
2. When JS passes in a callback to a TurboModule method, we take that callback (a `jsi::Function`) and wrap it in a Java `Callback` (implemented by `JCxxCallbackImpl`). This Java `Callback`, when executed, schedules the `jsi::Function` to be invoked on a Java thread at a later point in time. **Note:** The Java NativeModule can hold on to the Java `Callback` (and, by transitivity, the `jsi::Function`) for potentially forever.
3. It is a requirement of `jsi::Runtime` that all objects associated with the Runtime (ex: `jsi::Function`) must be destroyed before the Runtime itself is destroyed. See: https://fburl.com/m3mqk6wt
### jsi.h
```
/// .................................................... In addition, to
/// make shutdown safe, destruction of objects associated with the Runtime
/// must be destroyed before the Runtime is destroyed, or from the
/// destructor of a managed HostObject or HostFunction. Informally, this
/// means that the main source of unsafe behavior is to hold a jsi object
/// in a non-Runtime-managed object, and not clean it up before the Runtime
/// is shut down. If your lifecycle is such that avoiding this is hard,
/// you will probably need to do use your own locks.
class Runtime {
public:
virtual ~Runtime();
```
Therefore, when you delete `CatalystInstanceImpl`, you could end up with a situation where the `jsi::Runtime` is destroyed before all `jsi::Function`s are destroyed. In dev, this leads the program to crash when you reload the app after having used a TurboModule method that uses callbacks.
## The Solution
If the only reference to a `HostObject` or a `HostFunction` is in the JS Heap, then the `HostObject` and `HostFunction` destructors can destroy JSI objects. The TurboModule cache is the only thing, aside from the JS Heap, that holds a reference to all C++ TurboModules. But that cache (and the entire native side of `TurboModuleManager`) is destroyed when we call `mHybridData.resetNative()` in `TurboModuleManager.onCatalystInstanceDestroy()` in D16552730. (I verified this by commenting out `mHybridData.resetNative()` and placing a breakpoint in the destructor of `JavaTurboModule`). So, when we're cleaning up `TurboModuleManager`, the only reference to a Java TurboModule is the JS Heap. Therefore, it's safe and correct for us to destroy all `jsi::Function`s created by the Java TurboModule in `~JavaTurboModule`. So, in this diff, I keep a set of all `CallbackWrappers`, and explicitly call `destroy()` on them in the `JavaTurboModule` destructor. Note that since `~JavaTurboModule` accesses `callbackWrappers_`, it must be executed on the JS Thread, since `createJavaCallbackFromJSIFunction` also accesses `callbackWrappers_` on the JS Thread.
For additional safety, I also eagerly destroyed the `jsi::Function` after it's been invoked once. I'm not yet sure if we only want JS callbacks to only ever be invoked once. So, I've created a Task to document this work: T48128233.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D16623340
fbshipit-source-id: 3a4c3efc70b9b3c8d329f19fdf4b4423c489695b
Summary:
This diff adds the new API required to implment JSResponderHandler in FabricUIManager
The new API differs from the old API, but since setJSResponder is called ONLY from JS it's not necessary to have this method as part of UIManager interface.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D16543440
fbshipit-source-id: ca4bd4c1e4df706cda0eb16798e01f3350558d06
Summary:
## The Problem
1. `CatalystInstanceImpl` indirectly holds on to the `jsi::Runtime`. When you destroy `CatalystInstanceImpl`, you destroy the `jsi::Runtime`. As a part of reloading React Native, we destroy and re-create `CatalystInstanceImpl`, which destroys and re-creates the `jsi::Runtime`.
2. When JS passes in a callback to a TurboModule method, we take that callback (a `jsi::Function`) and wrap it in a Java `Callback` (implemented by `JCxxCallbackImpl`). This Java `Callback`, when executed, schedules the `jsi::Function` to be invoked on a Java thread at a later point in time. **Note:** The Java NativeModule can hold on to the Java `Callback` (and, by transitivity, the `jsi::Function`) for potentially forever.
3. It is a requirement of `jsi::Runtime` that all objects associated with the Runtime (ex: `jsi::Function`) must be destroyed before the Runtime itself is destroyed. See: https://fburl.com/m3mqk6wt
### jsi.h
```
/// .................................................... In addition, to
/// make shutdown safe, destruction of objects associated with the Runtime
/// must be destroyed before the Runtime is destroyed, or from the
/// destructor of a managed HostObject or HostFunction. Informally, this
/// means that the main source of unsafe behavior is to hold a jsi object
/// in a non-Runtime-managed object, and not clean it up before the Runtime
/// is shut down. If your lifecycle is such that avoiding this is hard,
/// you will probably need to do use your own locks.
class Runtime {
public:
virtual ~Runtime();
```
Therefore, when you delete `CatalystInstanceImpl`, you could end up with a situation where the `jsi::Runtime` is destroyed before all `jsi::Function`s are destroyed. In dev, this leads the program to crash when you reload the app after having used a TurboModule method that uses callbacks.
## The Solution
If the only reference to a `HostObject` or a `HostFunction` is in the JS Heap, then the `HostObject` and `HostFunction` destructors can destroy JSI objects. The TurboModule cache is the only thing, aside from the JS Heap, that holds a reference to all C++ TurboModules. But that cache (and the entire native side of `TurboModuleManager`) is destroyed when we call `mHybridData.resetNative()` in `TurboModuleManager.onCatalystInstanceDestroy()` in D16552730. (I verified this by commenting out `mHybridData.resetNative()` and placing a breakpoint in the destructor of `JavaTurboModule`). So, when we're cleaning up `TurboModuleManager`, the only reference to a Java TurboModule is the JS Heap. Therefore, it's safe and correct for us to destroy all `jsi::Function`s created by the Java TurboModule in `~JavaTurboModule`. So, in this diff, I keep a set of all `CallbackWrappers`, and explicitly call `destroy()` on them in the `JavaTurboModule` destructor. Note that since `~JavaTurboModule` accesses `callbackWrappers_`, it must be executed on the JS Thread, since `createJavaCallbackFromJSIFunction` also accesses `callbackWrappers_` on the JS Thread.
For additional safety, I also eagerly destroyed the `jsi::Function` after it's been invoked once. I'm not yet sure if we only want JS callbacks to only ever be invoked once. So, I've created a Task to document this work: T48128233.
Reviewed By: mhorowitz
Differential Revision: D16589168
fbshipit-source-id: a1c0786999c22bef55d416beb0fc40261447a807
Summary:
FabricUIManager.removeRootView() isn't currently used, removing it from the UIManager interface.
It looks like this is called from JS in paper renderers, but not Fabric, so we should be good to delete it.
Reviewed By: shergin, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D16275118
fbshipit-source-id: b8f3ae1dc7574ce17d8cc9e7fee72ef5dcc9b323
Summary:
Step 1 in removing the dependency on ReactContext from GuardedRunnable and other related classes. These are extensively by native modules and view managers, so in order to remove the bridge dependency from those modules we'll need to first decouple these classes from ReactContext. It turns out they only need ReactContext for its handleException method, which delegates out to product code. For backwards compatibility I'm exposing another NativeModuleExceptionManager in ReactContext that simply wraps its handleException method (since this interface already does everything we need).
I figured I'd keep around an extra constructor that still uses ReactContext for now instead of trying to migrate everything over at once.
Reviewed By: makovkastar
Differential Revision: D16270995
fbshipit-source-id: c9a8714bea7ac2a98e78234a0bae49140c00980d
Summary:
This diff migrates the usages Nullable and NonNull annotations to AndroidX instead of javax.
The purpose of this change is to bring consistency in the annotations used by the core of RN
Reviewed By: makovkastar
Differential Revision: D16054504
fbshipit-source-id: 21d888854da088d2a14615a90d4dc058e5286b91
Summary:
@public
The `WritableArray` and `WritableMap` interfaces currently require that nested arrays and maps also be writable. Nothing in our code actually relies on this, so we can relax this restriction and get useful properties.
For instance, it is now possible to construct a `JavaOnlyMap` (or array) that reuses `ReadableMap` and `ReadableArray` values by reference ( = structural sharing) instead of forcing a deep copy.
Reviewed By: kathryngray
Differential Revision: D16132580
fbshipit-source-id: 9f41189ebea2a82e775a7a4da8c357a5ce9c5b9d
Summary:
@public
* Removes `JsonWriter`; it's apparently a buggy fork of [`android.util.JsonWriter`](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/util/JsonWriter) which has existed since API level 11. Our version doesn't insert commas before objects or arrays within an array. Instead of fixing it, we can just use the Android one.
* Extends `JsonWriterHelper` to support serialising `ReadableMap`, `ReadableArray` and `Dynamic` values into a `JsonWriter`.
Reviewed By: kathryngray
Differential Revision: D16131713
fbshipit-source-id: d258af42b669f10218cae8b086e7adc3226d16c0
Summary: After we ran google-java-format D16071725, some Javadocs which weren't properly written broke. This includes putting unordered and ordered lists not using <ul> and <ol>, putting code blocks and pseudo-graphics not using <pre>. I ran through all the changed classes and tried to fix the broken Javadocs.
Reviewed By: cpojer
Differential Revision: D16090087
fbshipit-source-id: f31971cbc0e367a04814ff90bbfb2192751d5e16
Summary:
This diff formats the Java class files inside xplat/js/react-native-github. Since google-java-format was enabled in D16071401 we want to codemode the existing code so that users don't have to deal with formatter lint noise at diff-time.
```arc f --paths-cmd 'hg files -I "**/*.java"'```
drop-conflicts
Reviewed By: cpojer
Differential Revision: D16071725
fbshipit-source-id: fc6e3852e45742c109f0c5ac4065d64201c74204
Summary:
Right now JS triggers a view manager command with the following code:
```
UIManager.dispatchViewManagerCommand(
ReactNative.findNodeHandle(this),
UIManager.getViewManagerConfig('RCTView').Commands.hotspotUpdate,
[destX || 0, destY || 0],
);
```
As we want to get rid of calls to UIManager, we need to stop looking for the integer defined in native from JavaScript. We will be changing methods like this to be:
```
UIManager.dispatchViewManagerCommand(
ReactNative.findNodeHandle(this),
'hotspotUpdate',
[destX || 0, destY || 0],
);
```
We need to support ints and Strings to be backwards compatible, but ints will be deprecated.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D15955444
fbshipit-source-id: d1c488975ae03404f8f851a7035b58a90ed34163
Summary: Some TM lookup from native will fail assertion if done too early, because TM Manager is not initialized yet.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15872776
fbshipit-source-id: 7616c1424816f73a45aa1d9723e7807ae10392a7
Summary:
To avoid unnecessary class loads, and better modularity, let's use string keys (enum) to access JSIModule's. For now all JSIModule's are all known inside the core infra (only FabricUIManager and TurboModuleManager right now), so let's keep it simple and explicitly list them out.
The only problem here is we lose some form of type safety...
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D15872777
fbshipit-source-id: 9c2de7ef1e88ef3a6dff5888d644f9d8963af2a3
Summary:
This PR only fixes a one small orthographic error
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/25245
Differential Revision: D15796478
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: ccb811b43b0d2efc5d97ba335b60531a0fcbda10
Summary:
These changes were originally landed in D15327683. Unfortunately, I had to back these out because they revelaled problems with our TurboModules infra. Those problems have since been fixed, so I think it's safe for us to re-land these changes.
Please refer to D15327683 for a description.
Differential Revision: D15739355
fbshipit-source-id: 69bb3cec0731ba325f60c6c8459426546c79b54d
Summary:
Original commit changeset: e295dafdab7a
I'm backing this out because it's broken Catalyst. The fixes are in D15711539, but it could take some time to review and land them.
Reviewed By: rickhanlonii
Differential Revision: D15714896
fbshipit-source-id: c2c555a52d3d140dfdea7d54ccd8d3102c22a1c6
Summary:
`setTimeout` inside a headless JS task does not always works; the function does not get invoked until the user starts an `Activity`.
This was attempted to be used in the context of widgets. When the widget update or user interaction causes the process and React context to be created, the headless JS task may run before other app-specific JS initialisation logic has completed. If it's not possible to change the behaviour of the pre-requisites to be synchronous, then the headless JS task blocks such asynchronous JS work that it may depend on. A primitive solution is the use of `setTimeout` in order to wait for the pre-conditions to be met before continuing with the rest of the headless JS task. But as the function passed to `setTimeout` is not always called, the task will not run to completion.
This PR solves this scenario by allowing the task to be retried again with a delay. If the task returns a promise that resolves to a `{'timeout': number}` object, `AppRegistry.js` will not notify that the task has finished as per master, instead it will tell `HeadlessJsContext` to `startTask` again (cleaning up any posted `Runnable`s beforehand) via a `Handler` within the `HeadlessJsContext`.
Documentation also updated here: https://github.com/facebook/react-native-website/pull/771
### AppRegistry.js
If the task provider does not return any data, or if the data it returns does not contain `timeout` as a number, then it behaves as `master`; notifies that the task has finished. If the response does contain `{timeout: number}`, then it will attempt to queue a retry. If that fails, then it will behaves as if the task provider returned no response i.e. behaves as `master` again. If the retry was successfully queued, then there is nothing to do as we do not want the `Service` to stop itself.
### HeadlessJsTaskSupportModule.java
Similar to notify start/finished, we simply check if the context is running, and if so, pass the request onto `HeadlessJsTaskContext`. The only difference here is that we return a `Promise`, so that `AppRegistry`, as above, knows whether the enqueuing failed and thus needs to perform the usual task clean-up.
### HeadlessJsTaskContext.java
Before retrying, we need to clean-up any timeout `Runnable`'s posted for the first attempt. Then we need to copy the task config so that if this retry (second attempt) also fails, then on the third attempt (second retry) we do not run into a consumed exception. This is also why in `startTask` we copy the config before putting it in the `Map`, so that the initial attempt does leave the config's in the map as consumed. Then we post a `Runnable` to call `startTask` on the main thread's `Handler`. We use the same `taskId` because the `Service` is keeping track of active task IDs in order to calculate whether it needs to `stopSelf`. This negates the need to inform the `Service` of a new task id and us having to remove the old one.
## Changelog
[Android][added] - Allow headless JS tasks to return a promise that will cause the task to be retried again with the specified delay
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23231
Differential Revision: D15646870
fbshipit-source-id: 4440f4b4392f1fa5c69aab7908b51b7007ba2c40
Summary:
## Summary
If a NativeModule Spec interface extends `TurboModule`, we want to make the auto-generated Java base class for that NativeModule to implement `com.facebook.react.turbomodule.core.interfaces.TurboModule`. This makes it so that our Android code recognizes that Java module as a TurboModule.
When this diff lands, all internal FB4A NativeModules will start going through the TurboModule system.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D15327683
fbshipit-source-id: e295dafdab7a0e130820318aeaf0cafa41487689
Summary:
### Problem
According to https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/9145, the `--port` setting is not respected when executing `react-native run-android`. The templates that report things like what port the dev server runs on are hard coded as well.
### Solution
This commit replaces the hardcoded instances of port 8081 on Android with a build configuration property. This allows setting of the port React Native Android connects to for the local build server.
For this change to work, there must also be an update to the react native CLI to pass along this setting:
https://github.com/react-native-community/react-native-cli/compare/master...nhunzaker:9145-android-no-port-hardcode-cli
To avoid some noise on their end, I figured I wouldn't submit a PR until it's this approach is deemed workable.
## Changelog
[Android][fixed] - `react-native run-android --port <x>` correctly connects to dev server and related error messages display the correct port
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23616
Differential Revision: D15645200
Pulled By: cpojer
fbshipit-source-id: 3bdfd458b8ac3ec78290736c9ed0db2e5776ed46
Summary: `ReactContext.getNativeModule` can be used to access NativeModules. With these changes, it can also be used to instantiate (if necessary) and retrieve a TurboModule.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15167631
fbshipit-source-id: 3cb0d9a4be16cbadebbf6648c3f1481ba26513c3
Summary: In the future we're planning to decouple ThemedReactContext from the bridge (CatalystInstance). For now, we just need to be able to create a ThemedReactContext with a ReactContext that has no Catalyst instance.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15246442
fbshipit-source-id: 99ebda6521f4df72969011ea0e6ea41b046875c8
Summary: Refactoring ReactContext to move message queue initialization into its own function that can be called independently of initializeWithInstance. This allows you to create a ReactContext with message queue threads without a CatalystInstance.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15246287
fbshipit-source-id: 4b8c53e68112af7eded47d8c31311500cc296dfe
Summary: Refactoring ReactContext to move message queue initialization into its own function that can be called independently of initializeWithInstance. This allows you to create a ReactContext with message queue threads without a CatalystInstance.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14817741
fbshipit-source-id: f314a526c6534792714e5ba55dd873f1728c6b9f
Summary:
JSCallInvoker requires a `std::weak_ptr<Instance>` to create. In our C++, `CatalystInstance` is responsible for creating this `Instance` object. This `CatalystInstance` C++ initialization is separate from the `TurboModuleManager` C++ initialization. Therefore, in this diff, I made `CatalystInstance` responsible for creating the `JSCallInvoker`. It then exposes the `JSCallInvoker` using a hybrid class called `JSCallInvokerHolder`, which contains a `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` member variable. Using `CatalystInstance.getJSCallInvokerHolder()` in TurboModuleManager.java, we get a handle to this hybrid container. Then, we pass it this hybrid object to `TurboModuleManager::initHybrid`, which retrieves the `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` from the `JavaJSCallInvokerHandler`.
There were a few cyclic dependencies, so I had to break down the buck targets:
- `CatalystInstanceImpl.java` depends on `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java`, and `TurboModuleManager.java` depends on classes that are packaged with `CatalystInstanceImpl.java`. So, I had to put `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java` in its own buck target.
- `CatalystInstance.cpp` depends on `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp`, and `TurboModuleManager.cpp` depends on classes that are build with `CatalystInstance.cpp`. So, I had to put `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp` in its own buck target. To make things simpler, I also moved `JSCallInvoker.{cpp,h}` files into the same buck target as `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.{cpp,h}`.
I think these steps should be enough to create the TurboModuleManager without needing a bridge:
1. Make `JSCallInvoker` an abstract base class.
2. On Android, create another derived class of `JSCallInvoker` that doesn't depend on Instance.
3. Create `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` using an instance of this new class somewhere in C++.
4. Pass this instance of `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` to Java and use it to create/instatiate `TurboModuleManager`.
Regarding steps 1 and 2, we can also make JSCallInvoker accept a lambda.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15055511
fbshipit-source-id: 0ad72a86599819ec35d421dbee7e140959a26ab6
Summary: This is removing packages and libraries from the repo. Any modified buck files simply change the redirect targets to something more appropriate (no logic actually changed)
Differential Revision: D14950721
fbshipit-source-id: 6c14f827b76ca1dbaf83dcb983930f362c6a27d4
Summary: Need to force the double thing in more places.
Reviewed By: cpojer
Differential Revision: D14835792
fbshipit-source-id: fb7a5435675b322d5fbbe9858e08804e9abe65db
Summary: Removes useArrayNativeAccessor and everything needed to support it, similar to D14486283
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14487244
fbshipit-source-id: 7cfa91f7cf322c648c82be5951f3622cd6468961
Summary:
This was quite a rabit hole of remove deps -> delete dead code -> repeat.
Waaay simpler now with less duplicate lookups, redundant type verification, and extra function calls.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14486283
fbshipit-source-id: 035db30181755d046a1ae99760468b954b2449df
Emily Janzer
masaaki1915
Petter Hesselberg
Ramanpreet Nara
Joshua Gross
Christoph Nakazawa
David Vacca
Eric Williamson
Ram N
Moti Zilberman
Oleksandr Melnykov
Eli White
Kevin Gozali
Luis Miguel Alvarado
Joshua Ong
Krzysztof Borowy
Nate
rkang
Eileen Zhang
Rick Ratmansky
Spencer Ahrens
