Summary: There's no need to use private feature flag for overflowInset feature. This makes future refactor on feature flags easier.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D35866302
fbshipit-source-id: a3fde212ff40cd6d4c68832bb39b34de5a17a8d4
Summary:
Refactor of TouchTargetHelper.findTargetPathAndCoordinatesForTouch to avoid unnecessary lookup of views during the dispatching of Hover Events
changelog: [internal] internal
Reviewed By: lunaleaps, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D32296003
fbshipit-source-id: 93834c37331ad5d75645a5665a1c8c3d965765fb
Summary:
The overflowInset uses negative values to indicate extending from parent view. This diff fixes the math so that it's correctly check if the point is within overflowInset.
Changelog
[Android][Fixed] - Fix math for detecting if children views are in parent's overflowInset area.
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D33750129
fbshipit-source-id: 1a5a33a227280c687b158b4a81a56017b6f4f3e0
Summary:
This diff gates the useage of overflowinset to hit test algorithm to fabric renderer only.
Changelog:
[Internal][Android] - Use overflowInset for fabric only
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D33237281
fbshipit-source-id: e5cd78ee97f62f100d42d016241d1544fb0953ad
Summary:
The previous diff shows how `overflowInset` could improve hit test algorithm performance. This diff adds experiment to it in order to:
1. Understand the perf improvement in production
2. Provide quick way to rollback in production -- the changes are used by FB4A as well as VR
3. The changes will pass more instructions over JNI, which may have impact on perf.
To share the MC param values in both Java and C++ side, the value is hosted by `ReactFeatureFlags` and fetched in `FbReactInstanceHolder`.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D33179310
fbshipit-source-id: 327100d41f7b5a668ff0d2afabcdd1fc16cb5a18
Summary:
This diff adds `overflowInset` values in RN Android. These values are used to give an enlarged boundary of a view group that also contains all its children layout. Here is [the post](https://fb.workplace.com/groups/yogalayout/permalink/2264980363573947/) that discuss more on why this is useful. I steal the pic in that post here as TLDR:
{F687030994}
In the above case, we will get overflowInset for ViewGroup A as something like `top: 0, right: -20, bottom: -20, left: 0`.
This has been added in the [Fabric core](https://fburl.com/code/f8c5tg7b) and [in IOS](https://fburl.com/code/vkh0hpt6). In Android, since we used to ignore all event coordinates outside of a ViewGroup boundary, this is not an issue. However, that caused unregistered touch area problem and got fixed in D30104853 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/e35a963bfb93bbbdd92f4dd74d14e2ad6df5e14a), which dropped the boundary check and made the hit test algorithm in [TouchTargetHelper.java](https://fburl.com/code/dj8jiz22) worse as we now need to explore all the child node under ReactRootNode.
This perf issue is getting obvious when a view loads too many items, which matches our experience with "Hover getting slow after scrolling", "Hover getting slow after going back from PDP view", and "The saved list view (in Explore) is very fast (because it has very few components)"
To fix this issue, I added the support to `overflowInset` to RN Android by
1. Sending the `overflowInset` values from Binding.cpp in RN Android as a separate mount instruction
2. Update `IntBufferBatchMountItem.java` to read the int buffer sent over JNI, and pass the `overflowInset` values to `SurfaceMountingManager.java`
3. Creating new interface `ReactOverflowViewWithInset.java` and extending the existing `ReactOverflowView.java` usages
4. Adding implementation of getter and setter for `overflowInset` in various views
5. Update `TouchTargetHelper.java` to read the values and check boundaries before exploring ViewGroup's children
Note that in #3 I didn't change `ReactOverflowView.java` interface directly. I am concerned about backward compatibility issues in case this interface is being used in OSS. I suggest we deprecate it as we are not using it anymore in our code.
Changelog:
[Internal][Android]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D33133977
fbshipit-source-id: 64e3e837fe7ca6e6dbdbc836ab0615182e10f28c
Summary:
Similar to the previous diff, we should not allow view group that has clipChildren set to true to respond events that are out of bounds.
Changelog:
[Internal][Android]
Reviewed By: ShikaSD
Differential Revision: D33102331
fbshipit-source-id: de3a5ffdd5293ada1d2c211659e79edc697b5d15
Summary:
In D30104853 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/e35a963bfb93bbbdd92f4dd74d14e2ad6df5e14a), we added fix to the issue where touches on the child view that is outside of its parent view's boundary are not registered. The only exception to that is if the parent view has overflow style `overflow: hidden`. In that case, touches happen outside of the parent view should be ignored.
{F686521911}
That fix works, but it increases the complexity for the DFS algorithm used to find the touch target in two ways:
1. Before we only traverse views that contain the touch event point. If the touch event point is outside of the view, we won't step in and traverse that part of the tree. This is actually what caused the initial problem. The fix removed that boundary check (where `isTransformedTouchPointInView` used to do) and push it later. This increases the number of tree traversal a lot.
2. The check for `overflow: hidden` is happened after we find a potential target view, which means we've spent time to find the target view before we decide if the target view is even a candidate.
This diff aims to update for the #2 item above. Since we are checking the style of the parent view, not the target view, it's not necessary to check that after we find the target view. We could check the parent view and if it has `overflow: hidden` on it, any pointer event that are not in the boundary can be ignored already.
Changelog:
[Internal][Android]
Reviewed By: mdvacca, ShikaSD
Differential Revision: D33079157
fbshipit-source-id: c79c2b38b8affb9ea0fd25b5e880b22466ab7ed9
Summary:
Noticed we were sometimes receiving incorrect paths through the view hierarchy. This was largely harmless, as the hover events generated from this would still be correct. We just sometimes send more onExit/onEnter events than necessary.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: rshest
Differential Revision: D31434300
fbshipit-source-id: 3888270eaa16edf48f5d894a1e6daeca1ecfed1e
Summary:
Changelog: [Internal]
Add a path calculation method to TouchTargetHelper to avoid relying on the view hierarchy ourselves and better support virtual touch targets.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D30993410
fbshipit-source-id: 17577c815413ab0f03bcb6a2140ea1d4c9fd694a
Summary:
This diff migrates the usages Nullable and NonNull annotations to AndroidX instead of javax.
The purpose of this change is to bring consistency in the annotations used by the core of RN
Reviewed By: makovkastar
Differential Revision: D16054504
fbshipit-source-id: 21d888854da088d2a14615a90d4dc058e5286b91
Summary:
This diff formats the Java class files inside xplat/js/react-native-github. Since google-java-format was enabled in D16071401 we want to codemode the existing code so that users don't have to deal with formatter lint noise at diff-time.
```arc f --paths-cmd 'hg files -I "**/*.java"'```
drop-conflicts
Reviewed By: cpojer
Differential Revision: D16071725
fbshipit-source-id: fc6e3852e45742c109f0c5ac4065d64201c74204
Summary: This diff introduces the collapsable props in the viewProps. This prop is used in product code to prevent specific Views to be removed from the view hierarchy
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D10254679
fbshipit-source-id: 637665b8998a86e29e839eb6d405a0fac354c8d3
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
The new implementation of z-index did not handle touches properly. This fixes it by using the mapped child index like we do in `getChildDrawingOrder` in `TouchTargetHelper`.
**Test plan**
Tested that touchables work properly inside sticky headers (it uses z-index) on Android.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/13705
Reviewed By: AaaChiuuu
Differential Revision: D4987964
Pulled By: sahrens
fbshipit-source-id: 165f98e23d2f304c4dc87f536c22b68a8923d806
Summary:
When using text inputs inside a ScrollView with `keyboardShouldPersistTaps=false` (default behavior) tapping another text input dismisses the keyboard instead of keeping it open and focusing the new text input which I think is the better and expected behavior.
See #10628 for more discussion about that. Note that this affects nothing but the behavior with text inputs unlike #10628.
cc satya164 MaxLap ericvicenti
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/10887
Differential Revision: D4178474
Pulled By: ericvicenti
fbshipit-source-id: 0c62ea2fac0017d559d1f8674b0a686a5e1b3d2d
Summary:
This adds support for sticky headers on Android. The implementation if based primarily on the iOS one (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/React/Views/RCTScrollView.m#L272) and adds some stuff that was missing to be able to handle z-index, view clipping, view hierarchy optimization and touch handling properly.
Some notable changes:
- Add `ChildDrawingOrderDelegate` interface to allow changing the `ViewGroup` drawing order using `ViewGroup#getChildDrawingOrder`. This is used to change the content view drawing order to make sure headers are drawn over the other cells. Right now I'm only reversing the drawing order as drawing only the header views last added a lot of complexity especially because of view clipping and I don't think it should cause issues.
- Add `collapsableChildren` prop that works like `collapsable` but applies to every child of the view. This is needed to be able to reference sticky headers by their indices otherwise some subviews can get optimized out and break indexes.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9456
Differential Revision: D3827366
Pulled By: fred2028
fbshipit-source-id: d346068734c5b987518794ab23e13914ed13b5c4
Summary:
This adds support for sticky headers on Android. The implementation if based primarily on the iOS one (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/React/Views/RCTScrollView.m#L272) and adds some stuff that was missing to be able to handle z-index, view clipping, view hierarchy optimization and touch handling properly.
Some notable changes:
- Add `ChildDrawingOrderDelegate` interface to allow changing the `ViewGroup` drawing order using `ViewGroup#getChildDrawingOrder`. This is used to change the content view drawing order to make sure headers are drawn over the other cells. Right now I'm only reversing the drawing order as drawing only the header views last added a lot of complexity especially because of view clipping and I don't think it should cause issues.
- Add `collapsableChildren` prop that works like `collapsable` but applies to every child of the view. This is needed to be able to reference sticky headers by their indices otherwise some subviews can get optimized out and break indexes.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9456
Differential Revision: D3827366
fbshipit-source-id: cab044cfdbe2ccb98e1ecd3e02ed3ceaa253eb78
Summary: In React, ReactCompoundView is supposed to be implemented by a View, but there is no ViewGroup counterpart that allows mixing virual nodes and non-virtual ones (Views) in the same parent. This is needed because TouchTargetHelper always considers child Views when looking for touch target before falling back to View/ReactCompoundView. This works incorrectly for e.g. layout-only / flattened nodes. ReactCompoundViewGroup allow intercepting touch event before it is dispatched to its children. In that sense, ReactCompoundView.reactTagForTouch() is like View.onTouchEvent() whereas ReactCompoundViewGroup.interceptsTouchEvent() is like ViewGroup.onInterceptTouchEvent().
Differential Revision: D3018028
fb-gh-sync-id: d2c70a55afb9ce9823275e7483d72e0ebedf52e4
shipit-source-id: d2c70a55afb9ce9823275e7483d72e0ebedf52e4
Summary:New prop `hitSlop` allows extending the touch area of Touchable components. This makes it easier to touch small buttons without needing to change your styles.
It takes `top`, `bottom`, `left`, and `right` same as the `pressRetentionOffset` prop. When a touch is moved, `hitSlop` is combined with `pressRetentionOffset` to determine how far the touch can move off the button before deactivating the button.
On Android I had to add a new file `ids.xml` to generate a unique ID to use for the tag where I store the `hitSlop` state. The iOS side is more straightforward.
terribleben worked on the iOS and JS parts of this diff.
Fixes#110
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/5720
Differential Revision: D2941671
Pulled By: androidtrunkagent
fb-gh-sync-id: 07e3eb8b6a36eebf76968fdaac3c6ac335603194
shipit-source-id: 07e3eb8b6a36eebf76968fdaac3c6ac335603194
Summary:
public React allows excluding certain elements from touch handling by assigning `PointerEvents` filter to them, such as BOX_NONE - this element will not receive touch but its children will, BOX_ONLY - only this element will receive pointer event and not children, NONE - neither this element nor its children will receive pointer events, and AUTO - pointer events are allowed for both this element and its children.
This diff adds PointerEvents support to flat RCTView. Most of the implementation is copied from ReactViewManager/ReactViewGroup. One small change is made to TouchTargetHelper to ensure that it works correctly with virtual nodes when their parent has PointerEvents set to PointerEvents.BOX_NONE.
Reviewed By: ahmedre
Differential Revision: D2784208
fb-gh-sync-id: 4b831f9b1bfb8014a99d7b33534ae7ff7b4ab498
Summary: public
This fixes the ordering of methods in touch handling to take their arguments as X,Y instead of Y,X.
This is really just internal cleanup of native touch handling.
Reviewed By: andreicoman11
Differential Revision: D2703003
fb-gh-sync-id: d169436d21fd11c1a9cb251e7e0b57b2094699e4
Summary: public
Our view handling for determining if a touch was in a view was not transform aware. This updates it to be
transform aware (by borrowing the code from ViewGroup).
Now, touches will be correctly translated to the view if the view is transformed. They will also have the correct
local touch point.
This fixes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/3557
Reviewed By: andreicoman11
Differential Revision: D2696063
fb-gh-sync-id: 291f6b9884c610c29f8f8b9992c98d59863ab481
Summary: public
This moves Android touch events to parity with iOS. The locationX,Y value passed to js now is view relative to the view that is handling the touch.
The pageX,Y is now relative to the root view.
Reviewed By: andreicoman11
Differential Revision: D2670028
fb-gh-sync-id: 5438640d6c78633629b9a308a59cc306bb07815e
This is an early release and there are several things that are known
not to work if you're porting your iOS app to Android.
See the Known Issues guide on the website.
We will work with the community to reach platform parity with iOS.