Summary:
Now that the prop noops, remove the usages of the property. This is the point of no return for the prop.
Replaced listKey usage with a combination of `flow check`, regex replace, manual inspection.
Changelog:
[General][Removed] - Remove usages of listKey
Reviewed By: fred2028
Differential Revision: D39589089
fbshipit-source-id: 722ebb7dce038a2709656394b7d736e72f488bb7
Summary:
Following up on the previous diff to remove the only usage of `listKey` for persistent association, we can remove the need for a manual `listKey`, and instead rely on per-instance association via refs.
A followup change will remove the existing usages.
Changelog:
[General][Removed] - Remove VirtualizedList `listKey` prop
Reviewed By: p-sun
Differential Revision: D39466677
fbshipit-source-id: 6b49f45c987fff9836918ba833fbb16f24414ff8
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
Use supplied props in `_keyExtractor()`, which is used to map between frame index and identity.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Thread props to _keyExtractor()
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293586
fbshipit-source-id: e50823bacdf45adad3b8b655d66d305a1762e9b8
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
Change `_updateViewableItems()` to accept an explicit set of props, and a CellRenderMask, instead of using `this.props` and `this.state`. The eventual sink are the `_getFrameMetric*` functions, so a minimal projection of props is added that we can pass through to it.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Changed] - Move Props to VirtualizedListProps
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293587
fbshipit-source-id: 164fd4af7c370d905af53b0e9aafb3592d8659cc
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
This moves public VirtualizedList types to a new file, shared between both `VirtualizedList`, and `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. This allows us to make public interface changes in a single place.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Changed] - Move Props to VirtualizedListProps
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293585
fbshipit-source-id: 344d94466a2741ee67eb5754de5506eb3e265c5b
Tim Yung
Nick Gerleman
Genki Kondo
fabriziobertoglio1987