Summary:
This Pull Request aims at removing the making of reactnativeutilsjni as it is built from the same sources as reactnativejni. It also replaces references to reactnativeutilsjni with reactnativejni.
This should get rid of `reactnativeutilsjni.so` while reusing `reactnativejni.so` in it's place. This should give us some size improvements in the finally built apk.
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://reactnative.dev/contributing/changelogs-in-pull-requests
-->
[Android] [Changed] - Replaced reactnativeutilsjni with reactnativejni in the build process to reduce size
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34339
Test Plan:
1. Ran the CMakelist.txt file using CMake and I could see that reactnativeutilsjni.dir is no longer generated with my changes.
2. Built the aar from this branch in Android Studio and build happened successfully.
I am not sure if we could run any more tests. Please let me know in case anymore testing is required and I can do accordingly
Reviewed By: cortinico
Differential Revision: D38400481
Pulled By: genkikondo
fbshipit-source-id: 592736e56441328389ae89135667c336ff8018e6
Summary:
Changelog: [iOS][Internal] - Implement offsetX/offsetY properties on the PointerEvent interface
Simple diff implementing the offsetX/offsetY properties on PointerEvent — thankfully the touch events already kept track of these so it was mostly a matter of forwarding that data to the pointer events.
Reviewed By: lunaleaps
Differential Revision: D37830139
fbshipit-source-id: 77f33a99393350d32cbe449e6a009bdeb2a12d08
Summary:
Changelog: [iOS][Internal] - Implement screenX/screenY properties on the PointerEvent interface
This diff implements the screenX/screenY properties which report the position of a pointer in the device's physical screen coordinates.
Reviewed By: lunaleaps
Differential Revision: D37794415
fbshipit-source-id: 6c39c3651812f99e66b93647579a2935598ef6f2
Summary:
Changelog: [iOS][Internal] - add x/y & pageX/Y implementations to PointerEvent interface
This diff adds the x/y properties, which are defined as aliases of clientX/clientY respectively. In addition this diff adds pageX/pageY which, while not definted as aliases of clientX/clientY, are effectively aliases in React Native since the root view is not scrollable (client and page points only differ on the web when a user has scrolled the document element).
Reviewed By: lunaleaps
Differential Revision: D37766818
fbshipit-source-id: c7ad3750460b1913889c6d1a55b4c1edc6918f5b
Summary:
Changelog: [iOS][internal] - Add twist property to PointerEvent interface
This adds the twist property to the PointerEvent implementation on iOS which similarly to tangentialPressure doesn't really apply so we default to a hard-coded value of 0.
Reviewed By: lunaleaps
Differential Revision: D37760511
fbshipit-source-id: f1fccfd6b5d07024cea83d86925a9bfc2e6cc8cf
Summary:
Changelog: [iOS][internal] - Add tangentialPressure property to PointerEvent interface
This diff adds the tangentialPressure property to the PointerEvent implementation on iOS. This one is pretty simple considering iOS doesn't have the concept of tangential pressure so we just hard code it to 0 as defined by the spec.
Reviewed By: lunaleaps
Differential Revision: D37759634
fbshipit-source-id: 7ca0e47267f5fde76ace2b96d05ea2e154cb4b8f
Summary:
Changelog: [iOS][Internal] - Add `buttons` implementation to the PointerEvent interface
This diff adds an implementation of the `buttons` property by leveraging `UIEvent`'s `buttonMask` property.
Reviewed By: lunaleaps
Differential Revision: D37430270
fbshipit-source-id: 69fd3aebcb403e665349a24283a04c0eb82ff3e2
Summary: Changelog: [Internal] - If any relevant view events (pointer, touch events, gesture responder, etc.) are declared on view, then the view must form stacking context. We need this change for pointer events specifically to determine whether we've entered/exited a view
Reviewed By: vincentriemer
Differential Revision: D37678352
fbshipit-source-id: 02641549ef608b1c9468ac693c7da629143212cb
Summary: Changelog: [Internal] - We can now remove the '2' suffix as we had an internal implementation that was not truly aligned with W3C pointers but used the same name. We have aligned the internal types to match w3c so we can now remove the suffix that differentiates them.
Reviewed By: vincentriemer
Differential Revision: D37545813
fbshipit-source-id: 6f2336ae9e314066c340161113268c1f28621a71
Summary:
See commentary at top of stack.
Changelog: [Added][Fabric] New API for efficient props construction
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D37051020
fbshipit-source-id: 643e433c0d0590cfcd17bc7a43d105bed6ff12ef
Summary:
See commentary at top of stack.
Changelog: [Added][Fabric] New API for efficient props construction
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D37050961
fbshipit-source-id: 170a09c08d7406b6aac51d7e78cf295a72fdcf91
Summary:
See commentary at top of stack.
Changelog: [Added][Fabric] New API for efficient props construction
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D37050376
fbshipit-source-id: 2bea35a6d604704cf430bd3b2914988227d1abf8
Summary:
Perf numbers for this stack are given in terms of before-stack and after-stack, but the changes are split up for ease of review, and also to show that this migration CAN happen per-component and is 100% opt-in. Most existing C++ components do not /need/ to change at all.
# Problem Statement
During certain renders (select critical scenarios in specific products), UIManagerBinding::createNode time takes over 50% of JS thread CPU time. This could be higher or lower depending on the specific product and interaction, but overall createNode takes a lot of CPU time. The question is: can we improve this? What is the minimal overhead needed?
The vast, vast majority of time is taken up by prop parsing (specifically, converting JS values across the JSI into concrete values on the C++ props structs). Other methods like appendChild, etc, do not take up a significant amount of time; so we conclude that createNode is special, and the JSI itself, or calling into C++, is not the problem. Props parsing is the perf problem.
Can we improve it? (Spoiler: yes)
# How does props parsing work today?
Today, props parsing works as follows:
1. The ConcreteComponentDescriptor will construct a RawPropsParser (one per component /type/, per application: so one for View, one for Image, one for Text... etc)
2. Once per component type per application, ConcreteComponentDescriptor will call "prepare" on the RawPropsParser with an empty, default-constructed ConcreteProps struct. This ConcreteProps struct will cause RawProps.at(field) for every single field.
3. Based on the RawProps::at calls in part 2, RawPropsParser constructs a Map from props string names (width, height, position, etc) to a position within a "value index" array.
4. The above is what happens before any actual props are parsed; and the RawPropsParser is now ready to parse actual Props.
5. When props are actually being parsed from a JSI dictionary, we now have two phases:
1. The RawPropsParser `preparse`s the RawProps, by iterating over the JSI map and filling in two additional data structures: a linear list of RawValues, and a mapping from the ValueIndex array (`keyIndexToValueIndex_`; see step 3) to a value's position in the values list (`value_` in RawPropsParser/RawProps);
2. The ConcretePropT constructor is called, which is the same as in step 2/3, which calls `fieldValue = rawProps.at("fieldName")` repeatedly.
3. For each `at` call, the RawProps will look up a prop name in the Map constructed in step 3, and either return an empty value, or map the key name to the `keyIndexToValueIndex_` array, which maps to a value in `values_`, which is then returned and further parsed.
So, a few things that become clear with the current architecture:
1. Complexity is a property of the number of /possible/ props that /can/ be parsed, not what is actually used in product code. This violates the "only pay for what you use" principal. If you have `<View opacity={0.5} />`, the ViewProps constructor will request ~170 properties, not 1!
2. There's a lot of pre-parsing which isn't free
3. The levels of indirection aren't free, and make cache misses more likely and pipelining is more challenging
4. The levels of indirection also require more memory - minor, but not free
# How can we improve it?
The goal is to improve props parsing with minimal or zero impact on backwards-compability. We should be able to migrate over components when it's clear there's a performance issue, without requiring everything gets migrated over at once. This both (1) helps us prove out the new architecture, (2) derisks the project, (3) gives us time, internally and externally, to perfect the APIs and gradually migrate everything over before deleting the old infrastructure code entirely.
Thus, the goal is to do something that introduces a zero-cost abstraction. This isn't entirely possible in practice, and in fact this method slightly regresses components that do not use the new architecture /at all/, while dramatically improving migrated components and causing the impact of the /old/ architecture to be minimal.
# Solution
1. We still keep the existing system in place entirely.
2. After Props are constructed (see ConcreteComponentDescriptor changes) we iterate over all the /values/ set from JS, and call PropsT::setProp. Incidentally, this allows us to easily reuse the same prop for multiple values for "free", which was expensive in the old system.
3. It's worth noting that this makes a Props struct "less immutable" than it was before, and essentially now we have a "builder pattern" for Props. (If we really wanted to, we could still require a single constructor for Props, and then actually use an intermediate PropsBuilder to accumulate values - but I don't think this overhead would be worth for the conceptual "immutability" win, and instead a "Construct/Set/Seal" model works fine, and we still have all the same guarantees of immutability after the parsing phase)
# Implementation Details
# How to properly construct a single Prop value
Minor detail: parsing a single prop is a 3-step process. We imagine two scenarios: (1) Creating a new ShadowNode/Props A from nothing/void, so the previous Props value is just the default constructor. (2) Cloning a ShadowNode A->B and therefore Props A must be copied to Props B before parsing.
We will denote this as a clone from A->B, where A may or may not be a previous node or a default-constructed Props node; and imagine in particular that we're setting the "opacity" value for PropsB.
We must first (1) copy a value over from the previous version of the Props struct, so B.opacity = A.opacity; (2) Determine if opacity has been set from JS. If so, and there is a value, B.opacity = parse(JSValue). (3) If JS has passed in a value for the prop, BUT the value is `null`, it means that JS is resetting or deleting the prop, so we must set it BACK to the default. In this case we set PropsB.opacity = DefaultConstructedProps.opacity.
We must take care in general to ensure that the correct behavior is achieved here, which should help to explain some of the code below.
## String comparisons vs hash comparisons
In the previous system, a RawPropsKey is three `const char*` strings, concatenated together repeatedly /at runtime/. In practice, the ONLY reason we have the prefix, name, suffix Key structure is for the templated prop parsing in ViewProps and YogaStyableProps - that's it. It's not used anywhere else. Further, the key {"margin", "Left", "Width"} is identical to the key {"marginLeftWidth", null, null} and we don't do anything fancy with matching prefixes before comparing the whole string, or similar. Before comparison, keys are concatenated into a single string and then we use `strcmp`. The performance of this isn't terrible, but it's nonzero overhead.
I think we can do better and it's sufficient to compare hashed string values; even better, we can construct most of these /at compile time/ using constexpr, and using `switch` statements guarantee no hash collisions within a single Props struct (it's possible there's a collision between Props.cpp and ViewProps.cpp, for example, since they're different switch statements). We may eventually want to be more robust against has collisions; I personally don't find the risk to be too great, hash collisions with these keys are exceedingly unlikely (or maybe I just like to live dangerously). Thus, at runtime, each setProp requires computing a single hash for the value coming from JS, and then int comparisons with a bunch of pre-compiled values.
If we want to be really paranoid, we could be robust to hash collisions by doing `switch COMPILED_HASH("opacity"): if (strcmp(strFromJs, "opacity") == 0)`. I'm happy to do this if there's enough concern.
## Macros
Yuck! I'm using lots of C preprocessor macros. In general I found this way, way easier in reducing code and (essentially) doing codegen for me vs templated code for the switch cases and hashing prop names at compile-time. Maybe there's a better way.
Changelog: [Added][Fabric] New API for efficient props construction
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D37050215
fbshipit-source-id: d2dcd351a93b9715cfeb5197eb0d6f9194ec6eb9
Summary:
A huge set of props use YGValue directly, say something really basic like `margin`/`position`/`padding`/`border`.
All of these according to CSS spec actually support `number | "em" | "px" | %` units, but we are going to throw and hard crash on `em` and `px`, which are unsupported in React Native.
Using `tryTo` instead of `to` (noexcept vs throwing method) for conversion, and treating things like `margin: 50px` same way as we would treat `margin: false` which is not really supported.
Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - Fixed a crash on deserialization of props when using 'px'/'em' units.
Reviewed By: bvanderhoof
Differential Revision: D37163250
fbshipit-source-id: 59cbe65a821052f6c7e9588b6d4a0ac14e344684
Summary:
Seems like an obvious typo! Whoops!
Not causing any known issues, but... this should be fixed.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D36940476
fbshipit-source-id: d534ca3763b1f91e41c56953bf3d665e86db9e2b
Summary:
See also D36889794. This is a very similar idea, except the core problem is that BaseTextProps is accessing the same props as ViewProps; and for ParagraphProps parsing, it first defers to ViewProps' parser and then BaseTextProps. RawPropsParser is optimized to access the same props in the same order, *exactly once*, so if we access a prop out-of-order, or for a second time, that access and the next access are deoptimized. Paragraph/Text, in particular, were quite bad because we did this several times, and each out-of-order access requires scanning /all/ props.
This fixes the issue, at least partially, by (1) pulling all the duplicate accesses to the beginning of BaseTextProps, and (2) accessing them all in the same order as ViewProps, relatively (some props are skipped, but that matters less).
Practically what this means is that now, all of Props' accesses have a cost of O(1) for lookup, or a total of O(n) for all of them; each access is at the n+1 position in the internal RawPropsParser array, so each access is cheap. BaseTextProps' duplicate accesses, even though there are only 4 of them: (1) the first one scans the entire array until we reach the prop in question; (2) the next accesses require scans, but not whole-array scans, since they're in order. (3) The BaseTextProps accesses /after/ the duplicate accesses are all O(1).
tl;dr is that before we had something like O(n*6) cost for BaseTextProps parsing and now it is O(n*2).
Similar to my summary in the last diff: we may want to revisit the RawPropsParser API... but I want to tread gently there, and this gets us a large improvement without major, risky changes.
Empirically, based on a couple of systraces, average time for a single UIManager::createNode called from JS thread, before this stack: 17us. After: 667ns (3% as long). On average, for every 60 createNode calls, we will save 1ms on the UI thread. The savings will be greater for certain screens that use many Views or Text nodes, and lesser for screens that use fewer of these components.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D36890072
fbshipit-source-id: 5d24b986c391d7bb158ed2f43d130a71960837d1
Summary:
Without getting into the weeds too much, RawPropParser "requires" that props be accessed in the same order every time a Props struct is parsed in order to most optimally fetch the values in a linear-ish fashion, basically ensuring that each rawProps.at() call is an O(1) operation, and overall getting all props for a particular component is O(n) in the number of props for a given struct. If props are called out of order, this breaks and worst-case we can end up with an O(n^2) operation.
Unfortunately, calling .at(x) twice with the same prop name triggers the deoptimized behavior. So as much as possible, always fetch exactly once and in the same order every time. In this case, we move initialization of two fields into the constructor body so that we can call .at() a single time instead of twice.
In the debug props of ViewProps I'm also reordering the fields to fetch them in the same order the constructor fetches them in, which will make this (debug-only) method slightly faster.
What's the impact of this? If you dig into the Tracery samples, the average/median RawPropsParser::at takes 1us or less. However, in /every single/ call to createNode for View components, there is at least one RawPropsParser::at call that takes 250+us. This was a huge red flag when analyzing traces, after which it was trivial (for View) to find the offending out-of-order calls. Since this is happening for every View and every type of component that derives from View, that's 1ms lost per every 4 View-type ShadowNodes created by ReactJS. After just 100 views created, that's 25ms. Etc.
There are other out-of-order calls lurking in the codebase that can be addressed separately. Impact scales with the size of the screen, the number of Views they render, etc.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D36889794
fbshipit-source-id: 91e0a7ca39ed10778e60a0f0339a4b4dc8b14436
Summary:
This target is not a good idea for a number of reasons:
1. It groups up multiple targets which breaks the dependency graph
2. It does not handle dependency remapping correctly
3. It has no mirror into fbcode
We should warn people this is a bad idea
Reviewed By: alexmalyshev
Differential Revision: D36519357
fbshipit-source-id: d60ca3237c7710118732578fecd1b2fc8903321b
Summary:
This diff cleans up several Android Makefiles which we're not using anymore
as they've been replaced by CMake files.
There are still 3 Makefiles left, which I'm aiming to remove in the near future.
Changelog:
[Internal] [Changed] - Remove unused Makefiles from React Native core
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D36660902
fbshipit-source-id: 8afffac74d493616b0f9414567821cd69f4ef803
Summary: Changelog: [Internal] - Bypass dispatching an event if no view along the hierarchy is listening to it. Only applied for touch-based interactions. Next change will add optimization for mouse interactions
Reviewed By: vincentriemer
Differential Revision: D35739417
fbshipit-source-id: 134ffefef3bb4f97bf3e63b6bccc0caca464dfbd
Summary: Changelog: [iOS][Internal] - Only fire pointerEnter/Leave events if a view in the event path is listening to that event
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D35911045
fbshipit-source-id: 8b3021619622c3e83c15acea46c23bfe3e0f9284
Summary:
Cherry picking https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/33707 to main branch
This change is extending the changes made by alespergl to reduce the file paths and command lengths of ndk build commands
Essentially we are shortening the length of the source files by using relative paths instead of absolute paths as enumerated by the wildcard expression
This commit is extending the fix by including all the new modules introduced into RN for the new architecture, including the generated modules.
We are also reverting the ndk bump as ndk23 is crashing frequently when building RN with new arch. The reduced file paths lengths ensures the ndk bump is not required for relatively short application paths.
Fix building RN with new architecture on Windows boxes by using relative paths for C++ sources
## Changelog
Fix building RN with new architecture on Windows boxes by using relative paths for C++ sources
[CATEGORY] [TYPE] - Message
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/33784
Test Plan: Verified building on windows box
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D36241928
Pulled By: cortinico
fbshipit-source-id: 1ce428a271724cbd3b00a24fe03e7d69253f169b
Summary:
Now that the PFH node has been renamed this updates the pfh label.
Produced via `xbgs -l -e '"pfh:ReactNative_CommonInfrastructurePlaceholde"' | xargs sed -i 's/"pfh:ReactNative_CommonInfrastructurePlaceholde"/"pfh:ReactNative_CommonInfrastructurePlaceholder"/'`
Reviewed By: jkeljo
Differential Revision: D35374087
fbshipit-source-id: 61590f69de5a69ec3b8a0478f6dd43409de3c70b
Summary:
While it would be better to be able to do all of the ownership metadata at the Buck macro level, that proved to be more work than expected.
This diff adds the corresponding pfh label to all targets in `xplat/js/react-native-github` that have a Supermodule label. Once the migration is complete the Supermodules labels will be able to be removed.
Reviewed By: cortinico
Differential Revision: D35221544
fbshipit-source-id: d87d5e266dfb5e6ee087251dc34dff5db299bbaf
Summary:
This Diff moves from specifying a list of files to use file(GLOB) with
CONFIGURE_DEPENDS on several CMakefiles.
I've updates those where we use globbing also inside buck.
Changelog:
[Internal] [Changed] - Setup Globbing with CONFIGURE_DEPENDS inside CMake files
Reviewed By: ShikaSD
Differential Revision: D34826311
fbshipit-source-id: 8fc654626c897cdc4cdd79c699ce19f1e5e1212f
Summary:
Rearranges folly_futures configuration into a static library only required for `hermes-inspector` + `folly_runtime` which merges `folly_json` and mutex-related implementations `folly_futures` was used for. As `hermes-executor-debug` is removed by `vmCleanup` configurations later, it allows to shave additional 300KB from the release APK size.
Changelog: [Internal] - Rearrange folly build to reduce APK size
Reviewed By: cortinico
Differential Revision: D34342514
fbshipit-source-id: b646680343e6b9a7674019506b87b96f6007caf2
Summary:
This is the first round of CMake files to support the React Native build on Android.
They're supposed to eventually replace the various Android.mk files we have around in the codebase.
So far we're not actively using them. This is the first step towards migrating our
setup to use CMake
Changelog:
[Internal] [Changed] - First Round of CMake files for React Android
Reviewed By: ShikaSD
Differential Revision: D34762524
fbshipit-source-id: 6671e203a2c83b8874cefe796aa55aa987902a3b
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
To avoid unnecessary string copy in event pipeline, use move semantics.
Event pipeline has ownership of event type. Passing it by reference ends up in a copy when `RawEvent` object is constructed. To avoid this, pass string by value through each layer and use move semantics to avoid extra copies.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D34392608
fbshipit-source-id: c11d221be345665e165d9edbc360ba5a057e3890
Summary:
This diff fixes overflowInset calculation when a shadow node has transform matrix from a transfrom prop in JS. Specifically, this fixed the use case when transform directly used on a view component. When using Animated.View, it will create an invisible wrapper which will behave correctly with existing logic. This diff bring both use cases to work properly.
When a shadow node has transform on it, it will affect the overflowInset values for its parent nodes, but won't affect its own or any of its child nodes overflowInset values. This is obvious for translateX/Y case, but not for scale case. Take a look at the following case:
```
┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐
│Original Layout │ │ Translate AB │ │ Scale AB │
└────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘
─────▶ ◀───── ─────▶
┌ ─ ─ ─ ┬──────────┐─ ─ ─ ─ ┐ ┌ ─ ─ ─ ┬──────────┐─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┐ ┌ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┬──────────┐─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┐
│ A │ │ A │ │ A │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ├ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┼ ─ ─┌─────┤─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┤
─ ─ ─ ─│─ ─ ─┌───┐┼ ─ ─ ─ ─ │ │ ◀─ ─ ─ │ │AB │ ─ ─ ─▶
│ │ │AB ││ │ │ ┌ ─ ─ ┼ ─ ─ ─ ┬──┴┬ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┤ │ │ │ │ │
└─────┤ ├┘ └───────┤AB │ └────┤ │
│ │┌──┴─────────┤ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ┌───┴──────────┤
││ABC │ │┌──┴─────────┐ │ │ABC │
│ │└──┬─────────┤ │ │ │ ││ABC │ │ │ │ │ │ │
┌───ABD───────┴─┐ │ │ │└──┬─────────┘ │ ▼ │ └───┬──────────┘
├─────────────┬─┘ │ │ │ │ ├───ABD───────┴─┐ │ │ │ ├────────────────┴──┐ │ │
─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─└───┘─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ▼ └─────────────┬─┘ │ ▼ │ ABD │ │
└ ┴ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┴───┴ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┘ ├────────────────┬──┘ │ │
─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┴─────┴ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─
```
For the translate case, only view A has change on the overflowInset values for `right` and `bottom`. Note that the `left` and `top` are not changed as we union before and after transform is applied.
For the scale case, similar things are happening for view A, and both `left`, `right`, and `bottom` values are increased. However, for View AB or any of its children, they only *appear* to be increased, but that is purely cosmetic as it's caused by transform. The actual values are not changed, which will later be converted during render phase to actual pixels on screen.
In summary, overflowInset is affected from child nodes transform matrix to the current node (bottom up), but not from transform matrix on the current node to child nodes (top down). So the correct way to apply transform is to make it only affect calculating `contentFrame` during layout, which collects child nodes layout information and their transforms. The `contentFrame` is then used to decide the overflowInset values for the parent node. The current transform matrix on parent node is never used as it's not affecting overflowInset for the current node or its child nodes.
This diff reflects the context above with added unit test to cover the scale and translate transform matrix.
Changelog:
[Android/IOS][Fixed] - Fixed how we calculate overflowInset with transform matrix
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D34433404
fbshipit-source-id: 0e48e4af4cfd5a6dd32a30e7667686e8ef1a7004
Summary:
Changelog: [iOS][Internal] Use synthesize viewRegistry_DEPRECATED for Keyframes to remove RCTWeakViewHolder
Remove the `RCTWeakViewHolder` hack, since it can be replaced with `viewRegistry_DEPRECATED viewForReactTag`.
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D34468082
fbshipit-source-id: be41ed2df6ee195409724f6069fd99a793dca01a
Summary:
Changelog: [iOS][Internal] 4/5 Attach synthesize ivars to RCTViewManagers using RCTBridgeModuleDecorator in Bridgeless mode
- In RCTInstance, insert RCTBridgeModuleDecorator into RCTInstance into contextContainer
- In LegacyViewManagerInteropComponentDescriptor.mm, unwrap RCTBridgeModuleDecorator from contextContainer
- Then pass RCTBridgeModuleDecorator from LegacyViewManagerInteropComponentDescriptor to RCTLegacyViewManagerInteropCoordinator
- In RCTLegacyViewManagerInteropCoordinator, call `RCTBridgeModuleDecorator attachInteropAPIsToModule` to attach synthesize ivars to all RCTViewManagers.
This does not affect Bridge mode.
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D34439950
fbshipit-source-id: d814c56a52f226e3a2c96fea01efb51afc571721
Joshua Gross
Sparsha Saha
Vincent Riemer
Pieter De Baets
Genki Kondo
Kevin Gozali
Luna Wei
Nikita Lutsenko
Michael Lee (Engineering)
Nicola Corti
Anandraj Govindan
Chris Olszewski
Andrei Shikov
Samuel Susla
Diego Pasquali
Xin Chen
Paige Sun
